Laserfiche WebLink
t 21r400 s.f. of <br />f building pad - <br />Reductions - <br />f <br />.. <br />>rted to Sell at <br />O 3r000 s.f. <br />) 7,000 s.f. <br />.f. <br />),320 s.f. <br />mmm <br />Zoning Pile #1334 <br />January 12, 1989 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />Staff Coments - <br />Compare hardcover allowances for each pad at 80% through 60% to <br />estimated hardcover improvements. Does reducing the hardcover allowance <br />have any significant effect upon reducing the profile or mass of a <br />structure? If you reduce hardcover allowance you encourage upward <br />expansion. Lot 4 with graduated lower elevations to the north and west <br />will provide negligible visual impact upon the northern property owners, <br />certainly no more than Lots 5 and 19 would along the westerly existing <br />rural residential development. The 70* of depth (review Exhibit A) of the <br />building pad will place greater restrictions on structural planning. Staff <br />would strongly recommend no special restrictions for Lot 4. In staff's <br />opinion even at 60% or less hardcover allowance, there is negligible impact <br />on development as far as the visual aspect is concerned. <br />What other controls may be <br />intensification? <br />»re effective in dealing with structural <br />Heiqht. If the goal is to reduce visual impact of structures, a <br />height control should be considered. A recent recommended standard by the <br />DNR for all lakeshore property has been set at 25* in height. If height is <br />to be restricted than residential development along the horizontal plane <br />will be intensified and encouraged. Is this what is sought by lessening <br />visual impact? If a walk-out to the north is planned, the 25' hexght would <br />be measured from the lowest elevation at the walk-out side. This is <br />different from the existing Building & Zoning Code Standards that would <br />measure height from the entrance level (only if 50% of lower level is not <br />exposed). All other standards in the zoning code would be applicable in <br />determining height of structure (review Section 10.02, Definition 13). <br />Planning Commission may wish to consider other height elevations. For <br />staff, 25* would still allow 2-story structures with room for creative roof <br />designs. <br />No Accessory Structures. If we limit accessory structures, this might <br />encourage the expansion of the principal structure. This most certainly <br />will not be a neighborhood of detached garages and small barns, etc. The <br />most one would envision would be a maintenance structure, if even that. <br />*7- . ri-- <br />V-Vm <br />K;; / <br />.-a. <br />WWii <br />mm <br />mmm::.. <br />Zoning Fi <br />January 1 <br />Page 4 of <br />More <br />for the d <br />Commissic <br />building <br />Options i <br />1 <br />mmm- <br />It* <br />To : <br />Pads 1 tl <br />1. <br />cha <br />con <br />2. <br />rur <br />hig <br />2-2 <br />lii <br />foi <br />at <br />3. <br />PR] <br />api <br />4. <br />bo <br />re <br />im <br />CO <br />a <br />CO <br />de <br />Tc <br />develo <br />■w™ <br />______________-L