Laserfiche WebLink
involv6d A rAsldonce <br />apartment/mother in- <br />Total size of the 2 <br />esidence within the <br />said of the existing <br />shed floor area would <br />he surrounding homes <br />leider to discuss the <br />s has reaffirmed the <br />floor plans section of <br />najor problems with <br />iiplex will require 2 <br />ind electrical service <br />St side would have to <br />jvided along the east <br />r Street. Off street <br />street yards. <br />end a division of the <br />Art Center structure <br />ise exists within the <br />ir of 50* from adjacent <br />ennis court appears to <br />ased on existance of a <br />ck be defined for the <br />the north lot line of <br />back for the existing <br />c lot would be 29r400*. <br />rd as with the Bjork <br />e considered merely a <br />bional Use Permit for <br />to allow duplex use of <br />ivision the City must <br />the structure and the <br />cture compatible with <br />ffice/sfatey concerns - <br />e? <br />.• .. V' <br />mm <br />in <br />r..v yit- • <br />K: 'fe: <br />MM <br />’ V . J 1 <br />wm <br />P-- : - <br />m <br />.1^ <br />• i .ad;i=l <br />► M <br />Zoning Pile #1365 <br />January 13, 1989 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />C. Does the proximity of the Art Center provide other limitations <br />for the adjacent residential property. If the Art Center use ceased <br />what other uses could be housed in th« over sized structure? <br />Another school, a City facility, another governmental agency, <br />certainly, never single family residential. <br />D. Outside another school use for the Old High School structure, <br />what other uses could be made of this structure. Single family <br />residence with 3,600* s.f. of finished floor area, 50 to 80* from the <br />Art Center surrounded by small to medium sized homes is not feasible <br />in consideration of remodeling costs and resale value. <br />E* How does this conditional use permit application differ from the <br />Bjork application: <br />1. The setback, in the Bjork application was 630 feet and with <br />the Schneider application the distance is 1,350 feet from a <br />commercial district. <br />2. In the Bjork application the structure was already remodeled <br />into two distinct units and in the Schneider application the <br />structure is designed for school use. <br />3. With the Bjork application the yard area was severely limited <br />requiring setback variances for off street parking and future <br />garage. In the Schneider application no setback variances would <br />be required for parking or placement of garage. <br />F. How is this Conditional Use Permit application similar to the <br />Bjork application: <br />1. Both properties are served by sewer. <br />2. Both properties are immediately adjacent to commercial <br />used/non~conforming uses withing existing residential district. <br />3. Both structures contain finished floor areas well in excess <br />of areas of surrouding single family residential structures. <br />4. Exterior of both structures appear as single family <br />residential structures with single shared accesses to structure <br />Commission members may have already learned of the dilema of another <br />group that was interesed in purchasing the structure for continued class <br />use. We as representatives of the City of Orono have no interest nor say <br />over the sale of this property. We can only deal with the merits of <br />the current proposal based on the standards of the pertinent ordinances.