Laserfiche WebLink
*1 •• <br />itatlve of the Art Center <br />venue and other related <br />he center would have to <br />r to survive. The Hill <br />the early 70*s expanded <br />I 6 that contain the Old <br />ffered to the public for <br />lase was accepted on a <br />3el the facility Into a <br />, the Art Center and Mr. <br />ack variance application <br />;lve ownership lots. <br />hat approximately 2 to 3 <br />an of the Art Center are <br />all improvements. The <br />al building has not been <br />(Exhibit F) from early <br />t Center. Parking areas <br />ting parking on the site <br />\ do not exist along the <br />f 8 to 10 gravel stalls <br />3, the Markvllle plat <br />leen legally combined. <br />>n approval by the City. <br />. of area. Property Is <br />acres in area. In 1985 <br />Sewer Is available to <br />!d 10 sewer units. The <br />rer units. The building <br />.8 date. <br />visionr the Art Center <br />: from the newly aligned <br />separation between the <br />rt Center, the set back <br />t M. <br />rgaret Bjork application <br />tion the setback from a <br />Icatlon the setback Is <br />Smith Bay Marina). The <br />commercial zone but was <br />^forming commercial use <br />int application Involves <br />Lng commercial use (the <br />both school and limited <br />Zoning File #1365 <br />January 13, 1989 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />within the Crystal Bay neighborhood. <br />The building inspector has meet with Mr. Schneider to discuss the <br />remodeling of the structure into a duplex. Jacobs has reaffirmed the <br />statements made in Mr. Schneider^s addendum to the <br />entranVer***ThrS!^en‘ve7tical*p^ east sida <br />eaasa and a new curb cut be defined and curbing provided <br />side to prevent the backing out of cars onto Briar Street. Off street <br />parking must meet the required 50* setback from both street yards. <br />Property <br />Please review Exhibit M. Staff can not recommend a division of the <br />property as originally proposed by applicant. The Art Center structure <br />must have the required 50* setback no matter what use exists within the <br />structure. A structure of that size requires a buffer of 50* from adjacent <br />residential not to mention planning precedent. The tennis court appears to <br />be in disrepair and lot lines cannot be dlslgnated based on existance of a <br />tennis court. Staff would recommend that 50* setback be defined for the <br />existing Art Center structure running north through the north lot line or <br />4. Said line would also provide a minimum 30* setback <br />Hill School building. Approximate area of the duplex lot would be 29,400 . <br />Once again, staff should note for the record as with the Bjork <br />application the excessive setback variances are considered mei^ly a <br />variance to a performance standard under the Conditional Use Permit for <br />duplex use. The code would not have to be amended to allow duplex use o <br />the structure. (Not considered a "use** variance) <br />Prior to the filing of the application for division the City must <br />first decide if the duplex use is appropriate for the structure and the <br />surrounding neighborhood. <br />Issues For Discussion <br />A. Is the external appearance of the structure compatible with <br />suorroundlng residential neighborhood? <br />B. Does the proposed use create potential traffice/sfatey concerns - <br />are they greater or less than current school use? <br />'mil::- <br />y <br />Tj <br />r <br />f' <br />Zoning <br />January <br />Page 5 < <br />C. <br />fo: <br />wh <br />An< <br />ce: <br />D. <br />wh. <br />re: <br />An <br />in <br />E. <br />Bj< <br />F. <br />B jo <br />Com <br />group th <br />use. We <br />over thi <br />the curr.