11-15-1993 Planning PacketC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

L Zoning File #1842 November 10, 1993 Page 2 of 2 B.Three-season porch. BoUi the Building Inspector and the contractor have concurred that the existing foundation supporting the deck on which the three-season porch is to be constructed would not be sufficient to support the structure. The underlying deck shall be replaced but will not be e.xpanded upon. Joe Richter of the DNR confirmed in a telephone conversation that based on their original review of the issues, as long as the deck envelope is not expanded upon that they would have no problem with the improvement as amended. The improvements involving the three-season porch would also involve new structural work within lakeshore protected area. C.Overhang along south side of structure. Applicant wishes to install a 3-3'/:' wide overhang connecting the side door with the three-season porch. This was not considered during the first review and because it involves an intensification of structure within a lakeshore protected area, staff had no authority to approve the alteration. D.Connecting/new deck. In Council ’s approval, they allowed applicant to connect side deck with an existing deck adjacent to the three-season porch. 1 he connecting deck area could not e.xceed a total of 250 s.f. Refer to Exhibits C-1 and C-2. The Planning Commission did not address the matter of the connecting deck at the time of their review and was approved by the Council. Note that all the improvements above do not involve additional hardcover nor further encroachment into the lakeshore protected area. Review Exhibit G. Per the variances approved in Resolution No. 3314, the resolution need not be amended as a result of the amendments to the development plan. Staff Recommendation Staff would recommend approval of the amended development plan based on the findings h in applicant ’s addendum and that there is no increase in hardcover nor expansions.set forth in applicant proposed closer to Tanager Lake.