Laserfiche WebLink
.MINT TES OF THE ORONO PEANMNO COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD OCTOBER 18, 1993 <br />W »j'I884 ORVILLE FISHER - CONT. <br />Melvin J. Peterson, who tonnerly lived on the pn>perty and is technically the current owner as <br />the closing has not yet taken place, expressed his concern over w hat impact the current prohlems <br />could have on the Novemher closinc. He did not know about anv of the activitv in the vard or <br />W » m ^ <br />tree cutting. I'isher noted the title is a transfer for a Contract for Deed. Schriveder noted that <br />typically the Planning Commission deals with the owner of the pniperiy. not a future owner. <br />Since the issue is with the applicant, it will be assumed he is the owner. <br />Schroeder asked why Fisher wanted to cut the trees since he was fully aware of the City's <br />position of activity in the 0-75' setback area because of previous problems. Fisher explained <br />they did not want to cut as many as were cut but wanted to gain additional views. Schri>eder <br />asked how he would gain views by cutting only trees from 75' back since there would still be <br />trees in the 0-75' area. lusher responded that most of the larger trees were 60' and back and <br />thought that was beyond the 75' setback. He had assumed the water was at a high water mark <br />this year although he did not have a survey. lie measured from the waterline with a tape <br />measure. Gaffron explained this would not work because the water is actually lower than <br />normal at a 929 elevation. SclmH.*der pointed I'ut that had Fisher cut t^nly from the 75' line <br />back, it would not have helped his views. <br />Fisher did not want the area clear cut because there is a neighboring tennis court that he wanted <br />to be left screened. <br />Lindquist asked how large the trees being proposed for replacement would be. Fisher responded <br />thev would be Ash and Linden trees as tall as tln)se taken out and 4-5" in diameter. .Schrtteder <br />asked if al! trees taken out would be replaced, even those out of the 75' zone. Fisher confirmed <br />not all of them would be replaced. Lindquist asked if the proposed screen on the south side <br />would be done at the same time as the rest of the replacement. Fisher responded that currently <br />only 12-13 tree." were scheduled to be replaced in the 0-75' zone. <br />Schroeder asked if the City could do anything about requiring tree replacement outside of the <br />0-75’ /one given the nature of this particular issue. Gaffron felt it could be lied to mitigation <br />of the area <br />I’eterson asked how staff fell about the planting proposal. Gaffron responded that there had <br />existed understory and screening, and that the replantings proposed might have a different <br />character which might bt! considered gtnKl or bad. If the root sy stem is still in place, some of <br />the understory may grow back which would be belter than if it were all grubbed out. <br />Nolan noted the 4-5" trees to be replaced would require large equipment to do the work. He <br />felt understory would be desirable and asked about the discussion of gray-twig dogwood.