My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1993
>
10-18-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 3:56:21 PM
Creation date
11/1/2023 3:47:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MIMTKS OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD OCTOBER 18, 1993 <br />(#8) /J'1883 STEVEN M. ENGLITVD - CONT. <br />Lindquist expressed his coneern over the drainage issue and cautioned the applicant as he <br />prcKeeds with development of the pri'perty. <br />It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Berg, to approve Application #1883 for Steven Lnglund. <br />3855 Cherry Avenue, for a lot area variance for construction of a single family residence on a <br />0.37 acre parcel subject to conditions 1-5 as listed in the staff memo dated October 5. 1993. <br />Ayes 6. nays 0. <br />(#9) #1884 ORV ILLE FISHER <br />475 OXFORD ROAD, AI-TER-THE-FACT VARIANCE - PI BLIC HEARINX; 9:45 P.M <br />- 10:12 P..M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Orville Fisher was present. <br />Gaffron explained that a ctimplaint had been received from a resident that there had been .some <br />tree cutting in the 0-75’ zone. Upon investigation, a Stop Work Order was is.sued as there had <br />been a number of trees, 6 ' in diameter or greater, removed in the 0-75’ zone as well as <br />intensive vegetation clearing. Tree cutting in the 0-75’ setback area is not allowed by City <br />Code. In addition, Shoreland Regulations that were adopted about one year ago prohibit <br />intensive vegetation cutting and clearing in the 0-7.'*’ zone. Violati(>n tags have been issued and <br />are pending in the courts. The applicant has had previous grading violations in the 0-75’ setback <br />area on previous property. Staff would recommend denial of the after-the-fact variance and kx)k <br />at the proposed restoration plan to consider if it meets standards the City should require. <br />Gaffron noted other activity on the property as there is a sewer connection and remodeling <br />occurring which is separate from the tree cutting issue. <br />Fisher apologized to the public. Planning Commission and staff regarding the tree cutting and <br />stated it was not done intentionally. He explained that a college .student had done the work <br />while the Fishers were out of town and was given instructions not to cut within the 0-75’ zone. <br />Both the college student and Fisher incorrectly measured from the shoreline. Fisher noted he <br />contacted a surveyor to verify the 75’ .setback line so they could determine the extent of the <br />damage, and he also contacted Jeanne Mabusth to begin steps for restoration and corrections. <br />He is not asking for approval of an after-the-fact variance but determine what will be <br />necessary to correct the problem. A landscaper has been hired to develop a plan for restoration <br />of what had existed. Boxelder trees were removed but they would be replaced with trees (as <br />large as possible) that could survive m a low level, high water table area. A bo.xelder is <br />considered a weed tree that can ’t be purchased commercially so more expensive trees will be <br />replaced. <br />13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.