My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-16-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1993
>
08-16-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 12:12:20 PM
Creation date
11/1/2023 12:06:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning Pile #1853 <br />August 13. 1993 <br />Page 2 <br />Section 10.22, Subdivision 5 (B) - An area variance is required as property is to be <br />redeveloped <br />Required = 1 acre <br />E,xisting = 26,132 s.f. or .59 acres <br />Variance = 17,428 s.f. or .4 acres <br />Lot measures 124’ in width exceeding the 80% requirement. Lot width variance need <br />not be addressed. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Property Owners List <br />C - Plat Map <br />D - Hardsi'ip Statement <br />E - Applica»'ts ’ Survey PI s Photos <br />F - Photos ot Model <br />G - Floor Plans <br />H - Elevations <br />I - Hardcover Fact Sheets <br />J - Existing Survey <br />K - Proposed Survey <br />L - Average Lakeshore Setback Line as it Relates to New Structure <br />Description of Request <br />Applicants propose the removal of the existing structure and replacing it with a 43 ’x50’ <br />residence. In an attempt to conserve hardcover and minimize setback variances, applicants <br />propose a tuck under garage and no decks. Review Exhibits G and H, as applicants note they <br />are not attempting to create a mega-mansion on the severely limited site but a design similar to <br />a lake cottage of old. The comprehensive planning of the site has been guided and designed to <br />meet the special constraints of this limited property. The structure meets all other setback <br />standards except for the average lakeshore and lakeshore setback as noted above. Hardcover <br />has been reduced by 702 s.f. or 6.2% in the 0-75’ setback area. Hardcover in the 75-250’ <br />setback area has been increased by 716.5 s.f. or 4.8%. Hardcover is at an excess of 2.5% in <br />the 75-250’ setback area. Applicants have attempted to preserve the hill to the street side of the <br />residence maintaining the visual and sound buffer and still reduc_- hardcover and intensity of <br />setback variances in lakeshore protected area. Lot coverage is he'd at 8.5% where 15% would <br />have been allowed. <br />The side loading garage results in 449 s.f. of paving within the 0-75 setback area. In <br />an attempt to save the hill and the inability to install a three stall garage to the street side of the <br />residence, it was necessary to design garage to the side. Applicants are owners of at least four
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.