My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-16-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1993
>
08-16-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 12:12:20 PM
Creation date
11/1/2023 12:06:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1829 <br />August 9, 1993 <br />Page 2 <br />Mrs. Sieff s proposal includes the removal of plastic underliner beneath rose bed planters <br />in lakeshore yard and also the concrete slabs (rose bed planters 331.5 s.f. and as in earlier <br />application concrete slabs at 62.6 s.f.). Hardcover within the 75-250 ’ .setback is amended as <br />follows: <br />75-250 ’ setback = 19,000 s.f. <br />Allowed = 4,750 s.f. or 25% <br />Existing = 7,5(X) s.f. or 39.5% <br />Original proposed = 7,592 s.f. or 39.9% <br />Amended proposal = 7.265.9 s.f. or 38.2% (add a 160 s.f., remove 394.1 s.f.) <br />Total hardcover variance = 2,515.9 s.f. or 13.2%. <br />Total hardcover on the property has been reduced by 1.2% (existing = 7,660 s.f. <br />proposed = 7,341.9 s.f.). Excess hardcover within the 0-75 ’ setback area will be removed <br />except for the hardcover from wall and riprap as already stated in the earlier staff memo. All <br />structures either remodeled or expanded meet the required setbacks. <br />The Planning Commission is asked to consider the amended hardcover proposal. H <br />Planning Commission members wish to discuss other hardcover removals, please advise staff <br />prior to the meeting so that accurate dimensions and hardcover percentages can be determined. <br />The concrete walk along the south side of the residence has been deemed necessary by applicant <br />because of the topography (Potential erosion along with need for access to side of garage.). <br />Concrete aprons adjacent to existing detached garage provide side accesses for larger <br />maintenance vehicle and for pedestrian access door. <br />Options of Action <br />Approval of amended application: or <br />Approval subject to additional removals of hardcover; or <br />Denial. If application is denied. Planning Commission should provide deadline date for <br />removal of 8’x20 ’ extension deck.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.