My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-20-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1993
>
09-20-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 12:13:02 PM
Creation date
11/1/2023 12:06:35 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
394
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File ^1862 <br />September 17, 1993 <br />Page 5 <br />market value. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1.Review Exhibit O. Once the future road extension is designated, Lot 7’s building <br />envelope is severely restricted by moving lot lines further east. Where will a <br />home be located? Can 2 acre dry buildable still be maintained? <br />2.Engineer’s second review will deal with confiiming the size of the retention pond <br />in Lot 4 now shown at .55 acres. If pond is to be enlarged this will have an <br />impact on the available dry buildable area of the subdivision. Lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, <br />7 are all at 2 acres dry. <br />3.If it is Mr. Hallson ’s decision to join in with the current subdivision, it will be <br />necessary to table the review of the current application and republish tor a ten or <br />eleven lot subdivision. The applicant is aware of Mr. Hallson ’s interest. <br />Applicant should provide direction to the Planning Commission. <br />4.As the issue of the future road extension seems to be crucial for this review, <br />members should discuss the directives of the code and Comp Plan and make a <br />specific recommendation. <br />5.Does Lot 7 have a feasible building envelope? Where would you locaw the <br />residence structure? Moving the lot line east does not open up the building <br />envelope because of the location of the pond. There isn’t enough area to readjust <br />other lot lines. Are there other options of layouts for this subdivision? Is this an <br />eight lot subdivision or a seven lot subdivision? Should road extension be moved <br />further north or south? Review Exhibit P, staff sketches of other layouts for a <br />seven lot subdivision. <br />Option.s of Action <br />1.Depending upon applicant’s response to joining with Mr. Hallson in a <br />comprehensive subdivision of the two properties, it would be staff’s <br />recommendation that the current application be tabled and to encourage a joint <br />subdivision application between Three Star Trucking and Hallson; or <br />2.To recommend approval of an eight or seven lot subdivision, subject to the <br />following condition:: <br />A. The subdivision application cannot be presented before the Council until <br />septic testing is completed for the homestead parcel and for Lot 3 and area
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.