My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-20-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1993
>
09-20-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 12:13:02 PM
Creation date
11/1/2023 12:06:35 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
394
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Zoning File ^1862 <br />September 17, 1993 <br />Pane 4 <br />Review Exhibit E. at the pre-filing meeting with applicant, John Hallson, the owner ot <br />the property to the immediate west, was also invited to attend. During that meeting Mr. <br />Hallson's concern was with the impact of a private road upon the future buildability and dei^ity <br />of his property. Review E.xhibit E, Mr. Hallson*s attorney has written a letter to both the Cay <br />and Mr. Fisher of Three Star Trucking. In that letter, he proposes that his client join m the <br />current subdivision and be part of the determinations as to the exact location ot the future <br />extension corridor. Review the three potential layouts developed by Mr. Ploetz. <br />Staff has enclosed copies of all pertinent sections of the Comp Plan and subdinsion <br />regulations (Exhibits M and N) that were also referred to during the review of the Meyer Dairy <br />Addition and the Peterman Second Addition (Silver View Drive and Golden View Drive). These <br />sections provide the guidelines and authority of the City to seek future extension to undeveloped <br />lands The City has no immediate or future plan to install through roads with the acquisition <br />of these extension corridors. This requirement reflects a basic tenant of good planning tor a <br />future integrated road system when development pressures create the need for through roads. <br />Access to all eight lots shall be via the private road. No direct access will be allowed <br />for any of the lots within the subdivision onto Watertown Road. The City will ask for 33 <br />dedication of right-of-way for Watertown Road. <br />The drainage and utility easements should be shown 10’ along the perimeter ot all <br />property' lines except for the eastern perimeter where easement will be 25-35’ wide. Easement <br />should also be expanded at shared lot lines of 3 and 4. Drainage and utility easements should <br />be 10’ wide along perimeter of the road outlot and 5’ on either side ot the shared interior lot <br />lines. <br />Septic Testing/Septic Design. <br />Unfoitunately, Steve Weckman ’s septic report is not included in your preliminary packets <br />but his report will be available at your Monday night meeting. He has provided the following <br />preliminary comments concerning his review of the septic test infonnation. Septic testing <br />confirms that alt septic systems will be mound septic systems. In a recent visit to the site with <br />the on-site septic evaluator, Weckman found that the septic test sites on Lot 3 were driven over <br />bv heavy equipment and have been completelnegated for future septic use. Additional septic <br />testing must be provided for Lot 3. He also notes that I^t 8 at 3.5 acres will require testing for <br />an alternate site. In the original three lot subdivision, the homestead lot was at approximately <br />14-15 acres and septic testing was not needed. <br />Park Dedication Fee. <br />Please review Section 11.62, it shall be the City Assessor ’s responsibility to determine <br />die fair market value of the seven lot plat. The park dedication fee shall be at 8% of the fair <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.