Laserfiche WebLink
i- <br />Anung Fite #1836 <br />June 17, 1993 <br />Pace 2 <br />B.Ni'n-smictura! - lakestk^re patio. <br />Required * 75* <br />I-xiiting ■ 34.3* <br />Proposed » 34.3* <br />No chanfc. <br />Scettm 10.22. SuNl. I (B) • SevOisl story adsEthm wu! ca:roach the average lakeshore <br />PClhack line, refer to Hs.hi6it J. <br />Section IU.22. SuM. 2 - Review of hardcover <br />0-75* setback area - 11.294 s f. <br />Allowed ■* 0 ».f. <br />Existing - 1.791 s.l. or 15.35*^ <br />Propos^ - 1.791 s.f. or 15.85% iSecond level deck Uvated over patio) <br />75-250’ setback area ■ 14.828 s.t. <br />Allowed - 3,709.5 s.f. or 25% <br />Existing “ 3.370 s.f. or 23% <br />Proposed » 3.370 s.f. or 23% <br />No change proposed. <br />C.Total hartfcover. <br />Total area « 26.132 .s.f. <br />Total hardcover ■ 5.161 s.f. or 19.7% <br />Detcriptkm of Requed <br />The second level expansion w iil consist of a master bcdnx>m suite that w ill include a 3* <br />X 16* upper level deck at the lakeside resulting in an additional 3’ encroachment into tla? <br />lakeshore setback area. In reviewing iIk to-scalc drawing subinined ol the elevations, <br />overhang is shown at 14 ’ and will ikm be credited as hardcover. All exterior improvements will <br />be contained within the existing N>undaries of designated hardcover improvements on survey, <br />review E.\hibit J. <br />At the site inspection, staff noted that the lakeside patio area was made up of cement <br />blocks. Applicant shouW clarify if the existing patio is to be removed an*! installed with a <br />cement pauo. The replaeemenl of the patio would require variance approval and Planning <br />Commission may seek mtHlifications in the area and setback to lake. <br />J