My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1993
>
06-21-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2023 4:18:00 PM
Creation date
10/26/2023 4:11:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />To:OfofK> Pluming Commission Members <br />Ron Moofse. Cit> Administrator <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Sulycci: <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth. Buikltng & Zoning Administrator <br />June 17, 1993 <br />#1836 Ri'nak* L»uer. 1180 Tonkaua Road <br />Variances • Public I tearing <br />Zoniog District: <br />list of Exhibits <br />U:-1D. Lokcshorc Rcskkntial <br />A Application <br />B m Plat .Map <br />C m Pn^fty Owners List <br />D -Topographic Survey <br />E-1-2 Hanover Facts <br />F *Elevations <br />G •First FKx>r Plan <br />H •Second Floor Plan <br />I Basement Plan <br />J *Survey <br />The application involves vafiance» within the lakeshorc protected area as major portions <br />of the .isting residence are located within the 75* sciback zone. Applicant proposes the <br />installation of a second itory that will not extend beyond the existing envelope except for a 3’ <br />X 16' uf^r level deck or walkway that will encroach 3’ further into the Ukeshore setback area. <br />Refer to Exhibit J. Note deck will not result in an increase in hardcover as it will be totally <br />locat»J over an existing patio. The following ordinances are pertinent to this review: <br />I. Section 10.03, Subd. H (C) - Lot coverage. <br />Total lot area »» 26.132 s.f. <br />Allowed * 3,920 s.f. or 15% <br />Existing = 1,746 s.f. or 6.68% <br />proposed * 1,794 s.f. or 6.8% <br />2.Section 10.22, Subd. I (A). <br />A.Structural setback. <br />Required = 75’ <br />Existing = 50.7’ <br />Proposed » 47.7’ (3’ second level deck) <br />Variance = 27.3’ or 36.4% <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.