Laserfiche WebLink
Zomm ('ll* <br />\Utth 11. 1993 <br />Pafc 3 <br />[lr«rnplioai uf Hartlships <br />Review Exhfi»ii A. ApplicaBis mM thu stiucture musi be placed at 30* wrcei sctbacl. <br />bi order lo take aiKai^e of the more gemte sloped lopofraptiy As >tiu imne furtlter south, <br />there IS an tmrocdiaie drop al the 970 elesatioa If court was to be placed at the 50' setback, <br />the mucture would not ooly encrtwch the teure altenute dramfieW «te but wtwld require <br />excessive amounts of fUl to prosidc a stkbk base for the ciiun To place w the 50' reiback <br />would require the remcsal of the more mature trees thM oo»' shield or bullcr proferty fn^m <br />residence on Lot 8 le the tmsiediasr south Applicists also ask that Planninf OwmissHHi <br />members upon visitutf the site, how the $f»uce trees enclo« the prop^wed Vvatkm of the <br />tiWiU cam irmimuinf any impnet upon the surTou*fciing iwighbothood to ntmh. cast and west. <br />rs for ConsiderHioit <br />After reviewing the staked teimis ctwrt, if U is necessary to iiKnre structure closer <br />to street kx l»ne. woukl Planung Commission recommend any reib»;k kss than <br />30* from the street kx line’ <br />Applicants have noted that the existing mature spruces provide a natural butter <br />minimizing impact of court in street yard. l^Tiat conditions in the use of court <br />or de$i.^n features woild also minimize impact: <br />hours of use <br />no outskie lighting, <br />use of sumhield ^covw on fencing <br />cokre of fencing <br />ocher. <br />a. <br />b <br />c. <br />d <br />e. <br />3.Whiit impact H ill the placement of this accessory structure in a street yard have <br />on the existing neighborhood? Consider plantings, topographies, curvature of <br />road, placement of houses on adjacent lots. etc. <br />If a recommendation of approval is proposed, staff recommends that one of the conditions <br />of approval be that no outdoor lighting be allowed. <br />i