Laserfiche WebLink
Znaif« Ftk f I <br />Min:h II. 1993 <br />Pafc : <br />Lhii of llihibits <br />A ApflKauioo <br />B • Pto Mjp <br />C - Profcfty Oonm Lisi <br />D - Hanlctncr Survey <br />E • 1-2 H*nko\ef Mipi^Worksheet <br />F - Topographic Mj^ Lot 9. Fan iev <br />G - StmTcy/Propoied Sue Plan <br />H Weekman Memo 1993 <br />I - Aerial Map <br />Dcscriptioa dT Reque^ <br />Applicants {mipoie the uistallatioa of a 60’nl20* tennis court to he Uvated in the <br />ruHthwest comer of the property Tlie sinjcture will he set 30 ’ from the street and west side lot <br />lints and will also be pUKcd in froi* of the principal stmeture located at the required 50 ’ <br />setback. The tennis court win have a 10’ high fence and an asphalt base with iKrylic surficinji. <br />Rcviev^ Eahibi! I. The principal structure on Lot 8 to the unracdiate west is located to the very <br />rear of the property. It is suff s understanding that the owners of Lot 8 have no pn>hieni with <br />the projK'vcd location of the accessory structure. Staff tas not received any written comments <br />from this | ropem owiicr The City has received no comments from the homeowners’ <br />associatitm regarding this reepKst. <br />From a comprcbcigive review of the aerial of the neighborhood, it would appear that this <br />would be the first request for a nonrlakeshore lot owtkt or lakesbore lot owner to install an <br />accessory structure \ ithin the street yard. The proposed improvement would ihh be consistent <br />with the current patten: of dcvclopmcm within the Farview nctghb»vrho»xl The applicants were <br />also advised to review the covenants for Farview to determine if the accessors struemre is <br />allowed within a street yard. The City’s ordinance would require setback variances for the <br />structure’s encroachment into the required front yard and for the placement in front of the front <br />line of the principal structure <br />UjH)n a site inspection of the property, it was difficult to detennine whether a tennis coun <br />could be placed 30 ’ from the street lot line and m>t eiKfoach into the sloping topographies at the <br />970 elevation to the rear. Review Exhibit F. Appltcanis have been asked to stake the 60’x 120’ <br />structure for Planning Commission's review and provide the On-Site Septic Manager e <br />opportunity to confirm there w ill be no impact upon the protected alternate scptic area.