02-16-1993 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zooiog File #1803 Febniary 11. 1993 Page 2 The original subdivision apfilieatioa (1503) «its tabled at the CoancO oKcting of May 14, 1990. refer to D and E. The ma>or issue for that review was whether the rc»l was to be ififnded to a private road and if h>. where was the cul-de-sac to be located within the roadway. The adjacent neight^ vend major concern as the culde-tae wtiuld have major impact on her property if pbeed at the southwest comer It was Woodhill's piwifion that the ro^way did not need to be upgraded but the two property owners (McNcllis and Prudden) »rvcd by the road requested upgrading to a private road and that a cul-de-sac be installed to the east away from the roost affected adjacent neighbor. Couocd tabled the application to provide the City, applicant, affected property owners and neighboring property owners to work out an agreeable arTangemeni whereby neighbors needs would be addres»d and City's (g dinanccs safisried. Review ctf Coin II 1 The cuTTcni subdivision proposes a residential lot. an outloC for future development, an outloi for private it»d with cuFde-sac and an outlot over the wetland low area to the s<»ith side of the private road The residential kx meets the required 2 acres in area and required lot width of 200’ at the 50’ setback from the road. The private road wniot with cul-de-sac is platted along southern part of and the northern extension remains as a driveway %rvii^ the Pitakkn’s and Mc.N’clIis’ residences and the proposed residential lot (review Exhibit H). Septic As loi b proposed in the same configuration as the original, the septic testing provided for Application #1503 is still accepuble. All conditions set forth by Gaftron in that review will still be required, review Exhibiu G and H. Note Gaffron requiml a 50’ setback downhill from drainfield test areas for all construction or tmproven»nts. The lot will be a dinicull lot to develop and requires intensive planning before the final bouse location and house design is resolved. ilUxessAJpgradins of Curreol Roadway As in the eariicr application. Woodhill asks the City to delay requiring upgrading of the current private driveway until an additional unit is added. They have platted the private road outlot to the north lot line with cul-de-sac. The cul-dc-sac is <n the vnithwest kKation. Members may remember the objections of the adjacent neighbor concerning the impact upon their property. Several m.mirr rrres wiHild have to be renKwed if a full cul-de-sac is installed in the area. Review the covenants (Exhibit I) created in 1986 that govern use and upkeep of the pfivate drive. The covciuius address lla issue of maintenance and approved level of users by both Woodhill Country Club and Pnakkns with future subdivisions of the properties. Wotnlhill