My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-21-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
11-21-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2023 3:27:26 PM
Creation date
10/19/2023 3:22:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />MINI TES of the ORONO RLANNlMi C OMMISSION <br />MEETING HEED ON OCTOBER 17. <br />(-13 . -1074 - Corbin - Coniimied) <br />Mabusth reported this appUcation is for appro\-al of a conditional use pennit and lakeshore <br />hardcover v ihancc for the rcconstruclion of rctaimm: wails within the laWeshoic vaid. <br />maior portions of which are kKated within the 0-75’ setback area nie fonner walls were <br />amstiuttcd of wood and had rotted and detenorated to the pomi ot retiimine <br />replacement The applicant has provided siU fencing at the ba^e ot the bank to prevent <br />further erosion b«o the lake The applicant did not real:/e that permits were necess^’ t o <br />replace existing walls and had begun installing boulder walls The lower level wall that <br />had been installed is approximately 3 ’ high Upon a site inspcctioiv the Engineer <br />determined the retaining walls would be over 7 in seaions requiring drainage tiles and <br />eco-tech fabric <br />The applicant has revised the plan, which the I-nginecr has approved, consisnnu ot a 4 <br />wide stairway and three boulder walls at V in hcr.eht The Enarneer did not d.scnss <br />lartdseapina. and StalTwould recommend plammgs to bulTer the slaikncss The applicant <br />noted thai'aUhough this plan calls lot hatdeover variance, he would he taking out giavcl <br />haidcover and replacing with grass between the w.alls <br />amount now existmu 1 he Planning Commission would like the non-contormmg drivuw v <br />which ains down to'the lake on the east side of the property removeu Ihe appheam <br />would like to retain this driveway as he feels it is a vttal asset to him and his use ot the <br />lake <br />Smith moved Lindquist seconded, to approve Application 41974 with two added <br />provisions-. Dprescniaiion of a landscaping plan where the retaimng wails are to be ^ <br />installed and 2)removal of the driveway from the existing parking area down to ne a t <br />over a five-year period Ayes b. Nays 1. Peterson, who said he would deny the <br />application <br />(dl4) »ms l.\RRY A.MI.\LT, 2190 \VAY7.AT.\ BOULEVARO - APPEALS - <br />PllBUC HEARING - 11:00-11:05 P.M. <br />.\ves 7, Nays 0. <br />ftiliinifctfki ifii. i.'i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.