Laserfiche WebLink
minutes of the orono planning commission <br />NiEETING HELO ON OCTOBER 17. <br />(42 - ^1895 - Wolfe - Continued) <br />Mr Wolfe commented that the City asked to install a drainage ditch six years ago which ts <br />60-70* from the shoreline It buflers the shed lliough can be hazardous to children Wolfe <br />said the problem is security He feels the easement creates problems with trespassing <br />and theft, and the shed cases this pioblem The shed houses the pump for his imuaiion <br />sx'stem and electricity tor the system <br />Mr. Wolfe reported knowing he needed a building permit He w as of the opinion nut the <br />builder had acquired the permit and had placed a public notice sign on his lot Wolfe later <br />found out that no such permit was obtained, and the sign was probably stolen elsewhere <br />Schroeder noted that the applicant should not have to incur malicious secuniy problems <br />suanesting a fence be erected in the area to help alleviate these problems. Schroeder <br />reported that a ncigl.bor had received a variance tor such a tence. <br />Nolan commented that security docs not wairam a hardship in that security from spcxific <br />intrusions noted by Applicant is not solved by a .shed. Nolan noted there are other ateas <br />where the shed could be Uxated Council members also said a lock box, which is about <br />4'x5* and 4’ high, would serve the needs for the electrical and pump equipment <br />Peterson moved. Berg seconded, to deny Application iil895 tor an atler-lhe-fact vat .once <br />for conslruclion of a shed for Pat Wolfe at 2871 Cas 'c Point Road Aves 7, Nays ') <br />(U4) ##1959 JAMES W. OGL.AND, 3345 CRYSTAL BAY RO.AD - AFTFR-TIIE- <br />FACT VARIANCE - CONTINllATION OF PIUIUC HEARING 7:50-7:57 P.M <br />Mr. Ogland was present. <br />GatTron stated this application was tabled from the last meeting to devasc a revision tor the <br />location of the shed The shed is located on Dakota Rail right-of-way and built without a <br />permit. Ogland has agreed to move the shed bringing it to the zero setback. 10* from the <br />house which will preserve a large tree I lardcover percentages have bwn calculated .A <br />lot coverage variance is technically needed but is less than the 1500 s t allowed