My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-21-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
11-21-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2023 3:27:26 PM
Creation date
10/19/2023 3:22:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Zoning File #1*)85 <br />November 16. 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />rcconJed Hi' major concern is thai the proposed Jrise sc.suld base a 15?« pradc down from ihe <br />road sshich sc.Hild nor be accepuble. The erading plan should be modilied lo include existing <br />Street 2rade and to revise grades for access drive. <br />Review Exhibits F aisl G. drainage from the north side of the residence w ill flow' to the drainage <br />way at the north side lot line. Drainage from the driveway and the remainder ot the hou.se at <br />the south side will drain between house and septic sites In order to protect the septic areas, the <br />-neineer asks that a swale be installed along the south side of the residence that would convey <br />drainage to the east. Review Exhibit H. the elevations of the residence reveal no height <br />problems Heieht has been determmed at the highest existing elevation. The application cannot <br />be scheduled before the Council until applicant ’s surveyor has submitted a revised grading plan <br />for review and approval by the City Engineer. <br />issu» for Consideration <br />Section 10.03. Subd. 21 was amended in the mid*80s. It was the City s intent to provide <br />guidance to the building official as to what would be considered unusual land alterations <br />Involving fill m2, removals or grading activities proposed with the application tor new <br />residential construction The guidelines have been defined in Section 10.03. Subd. 21(1- <br />3), The conditional use permit would provide adequate notice to adjacent residents where <br />intense land .ilterations may cause disruptions in nonnal activities, damage access roads, <br />etc At your (ktober meeting, you reviewed a conditional use permit tor tilling activities <br />involvine 450 cubic >ards loWactumulated fn>m soil corrective measures. The fill was <br />used to'create a rear walkout where existing elevations did not permit. Does the <br />Planning Commission have any objection to properties being filled or cut to allow rear <br />walkouts.* Should homes be designed to fit existing elevatioas? <br />2. Are there other issues that should be addressed with this type of application? <br />As already noted above, the staff cannot schedule the application betore the Council until an <br />amended grading and drainage pian has been submitted for the City Engineer s review.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.