My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
10-17-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2023 3:57:44 PM
Creation date
10/19/2023 3:20:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
415
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />o. o CITYof ORONO <br />Nfimkipal OfTicrs <br />Street Mirts& <br />rrw wkf t»n*2f <br />0«ww. Vf< 5535S <br />f 0 Bci <br />Cf*st»l Bl». MS 55323 0066 <br />Mav 4. 1994 <br />Mr. Patrick Wolfe <br />2871 Casco Point Road <br />Wavzata. Minnesota 55391 <br />Re: Zoning Application #1895 <br />Dear Mr. Wolfe: <br />I have completed a preliminary review of viHir after-the-fact application for variances to <br />construct an accessory structure (IO’x 12’ shed) on your property. The certificate of survey by <br />Otto Associates which you provided contains a wealth of information which leads me to make <br />the following comments: <br />The survey is extremely misleading, showing a dark line boundary that does iK)t <br />match the legal boundary of your propeny. No addendum was provided by you <br />or your surveyor to c.xplain the format of this survey. <br />The shed is clearly not within your property ’ boundaries, but within the right-of- <br />way of Carman Avenue. <br />Tne survey suggests a "proposed" change to your legal description which would <br />place the shed approximately 4’ within your property. However, you have not <br />applied for a vacation of a portion ot Carman Avenue, and it you did so, the City <br />would undoubtedly deny such a vacation given the DNR s consistent opposition <br />to such proposals which reduce public access to lakes, and given the City ’s use <br />of the right-of-way as a public beach area. <br />A site inspection reveals that the shed is approximately 8’ from the normal <br />shoreline (not 12’-14’ as survey shows), and obviously within 75’ of the lake <br />where no structures or hardcover are allowed. Your surveyor did not identify the <br />929.4’ elevation contour which is required by the City for all surveys abutting <br />Lake Minnetonka. <br />The survey shows and site inspection verifies that your recent landscaping has <br />encroached onto the 60 ’ City right-of-way by as much as 20 ’. <br />Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.