Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1971 <br />Ctetober 7.1994 <br />Page 3 <br />A.Year round use of facility. <br />B.F’lumbing and heating. <br />C.Potential use for bedrooms. <br />D Bathroom with shower. <br />E.Others raised by Planning Commission. <br />2. Would the propKised professional use of the auxiliary <br />4 <br />3. <br />4. <br />license application? <br />Can the existing residei'ce be used for expansion to provide additional work space area? <br />Review Exhibit K, note residence structure cannot be expanded on south and west sides <br />because of ^substandard setbacks. Existing improvements on east and nonh side of <br />residence ina)' pose expansion problems. This matter was not addressed in applicants’ <br />addendum bui in conversation with one of the applicants at my site inspection, the <br />specific chaiacter and design of existing residence was discussed. It may be impossible <br />to expand existing residence without destroying character ot residence structure. <br />What should be the City’s concerns when allowing living space expansions within <br />detached structures? What kind of controls ere necessary to prevent future violations? <br />Is a code amendment needed? <br />Issues of Action <br />To approve as proposed; or <br />To approve as amended; or <br />To table application providing applicants additional time to consider other options. The delay <br />in this review may create problems for applicants for the garage currently being constructed.