10-17-1994 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1971 October 7, 1994 Page 2 Request for Conditional Use Permit Applicants propose the reconstruction of a detached garage/stable with a new two stor>’ garage with additional living area expansion. The footprint of the detached structure w ill be 38’x24’ with a first fltx>r level covered porch akldition at the south side of structure. The new structure will be constructed with the same exterior material/finish as the residence stracture. Per Exhibit B, applicants* addendum, applicants note that it is not their intention to create a studio apartmem or guest house within the proposed living space of the detached garage currently under construction. The issue for the building staff in doing the plan review is that the structure will have plumbing and heating and living space will be for year round use. There is a full bathriHvm on the lower level with a shower and the auxiliary rcnmi adjacent to the bathroom area shall be equipped with a large work sink. I he sink will serve the applicants with their painting/design projects. It is possible that this same type of sink could function for laundry and kitchen use. The only element needed to convert this structure to an independent residential unit would be the plugging in of a stove and refrigerator. The structure as proposed could function as independent residential unit. As noted above, the code would require 10 acres in area to support two residential units. The property consists of 2.8 acres and would never be approved for guest house use. The code does not address living space expansions within detached garages or other detached structures on a property. There are no code prohibitions or restrictions in the zoning code which disallow the proposed use. 'Fhe problem is the potential for violations of the zoning code with unauthorized expansions of the living space to more intense unauthorized use. Review Exhibit B as it relates to applicants' use of the studio area. The studio or work area for both applicants would appear to be accessorv to their principal employment serving as expanded work area/space. Issues for Consideration 1.The lot contains 2.8 acres and would never meet the area standard for a second residential unit. Does the mere denial of a conditional use permit being filed on the chain of title provide adequate controls for the proposed living space area? Should other modifications be made in the proposed improvement plan that would provide greater protection to the City for unauthorized expansions in use? Members shared comments on the following proposed improvements;