Laserfiche WebLink
RcqucM for O^jikiI Actk^r corairaieU <br />page 4 of 5 <br />Ocuibcr 6. <br />Zoning File #l%7 <br />flcnncpin Public Uorks DcparfnU'nl Conimtnts <br />Hennepin DOT has indicated ajsproval of Outloi B as an access location. They also request <br />additional right of-wav to total 40' from the ccnierliiw of Bavside Road. It would be <br />inconsistent with past City practice to require this on Dayside Road which is defined in the <br />Comprehensive Plan as a ‘’collecter" street requiring only 30-33 ’ either side of centerline. Staff <br />recommends no additioDal right-of-way be required at this time. <br />Stimmarv of Issues <br />Will Council accept the agreement in lieu of including Gelfre’s property in the plat to <br />create a continuous access outlet corridor to Outlet C? <br />2.Will CourKil accept the concept of making the remaining 14 acres an outlot with no <br />development (not even one house) allowed until it is replatted or granted individual <br />buildability in the future\> Council may w ish to confirm applicatit's intent for priKeeding <br />with replatting Outlot C in the ne.xi year with or without the White property. <br />Options for Action <br />1. Approve per the findings and conditions of the preliminary plat approval resolution <br />attached. <br />Refer back to Planning Commission for funher review ’. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />Direct staff to draft a resolution of denial, stating reasons <br />Table, requesting funher information (specify) <br />Other. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />In recognition of Planning Commission ’s intent in recommending denial, stalf has prepared a <br />resolution for nreliminary plat approval incorporating applicant’s proposed preliminary plat and <br />agreement as presented. While staff would prefer the inclusion of the Geffre property to create <br />a complete outlot corridor to CXitlot C. ine agreement appears to eliminate foreseeable access <br />issues as long as its term "replatted into buildable parcels" can be construed as including the <br />mere revision of Outlet C to single buildable lot status. If not, then language of the agreement <br />should be revised to do si). or the Geffre property should be included in the plat and the <br />triangular outlot created.