10-17-1994 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zt>ning Fik #1%7 CX'tobcr 13. 19^ Pace 2 Shortly after tlw Council meeting, Jippikants ncnified staff that they would! include the Geffre prc^rty and submit with an outlet per staffs recommendation (sec Exhibit A). .Additional Information An ;^'ceptabk on-site sewage treaimeni site evaluation report has been received, indicating primary and alternate sites for immediate and future use on the Olson property. Since inclusion of the Geffre property is furKtionally a lot liiw rearrangement that provides him more propeny potentially suitable for future septic use without removing any existing septic capability, no septic testing has been required for the Geffre property. Acreages for each parcel are as follow's: Total Area « 17.49 acres Lot 1, Block 1 (Olson)2.75 ac Uvt 1. BhK'k 2 (Geffre)1.94 ac Outlot A 0.28 ac Outlot B (future road)0.32 ac Outlot C (for future 14.13 ac development) Outlot D ( future road)0.07 ac With the current proposal per stafTs recommendation, the easement vs. outlot issue is eliminated. Ilowevei. Geffre's lot is (temporarily) reduced from 2.01 acres to 1.94 acres, lie w ill retain ownership of the 0.07 acre Outlot D, but will in effect “trade" Outlot D for Outlet A if the B-D corridor is used in developing Outlot C (in which case Geffre ends up with 2.22 acres). It may be appropriate that the agreement between the 3 parties be mcxlified to apply to "heirs and assigns" in the event that one of the parties sells their property. The City Attorney has been asked to review the agreement. Because the 14 acres is to be platted as an outlot for future development, construction of a road is not required until development of that parcel. The current plan still leaves the applicants the option ot developing a new roadway through the adjacent White properly, although applicants note the potential for acquiring that property appears to be poor at this lime.