Laserfiche WebLink
To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />SubjecI: <br />Note: <br />Chairman Schri^eUcr and Or<>no Planmi^ C^>mmts?ion Mcmbens <br />Ron Mot'fsc. City Admini'^trator <br />Nttchael P Gaflnm. Assi‘*tant Planning Sl /oninc Administrator <br />October 13. 1994 <br />#1%7 Robert S. Olson. K-P Properties. IrK*., 4645 Baysidc Road - Preliminary <br />Plat Approval - Referral from City Council <br />Planning Ccmimission reviewed this item (m September 19 atKl at applicant ’s <br />request recommended denial to move it along to the Council Cinincil reviewed <br />the item on (Xtober 10 and referred it back to Plannim: Commissnm <br />1 <br />I ist of Fxhihits <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />I <br />Revised Plat Drawings Including Gcffre Propeny <br />Council Action Notice 10'13/94 <br />Planning Commission Minutes 9/19/94 .. <br />lOi'O-t A* Pnfiv*T«»—cy <br />Memos and l:\hibits of 10 6/94 and 9/15 94 <br />A|)plicaiion Backgrmiiid <br />At your September meeting. Planning Coimnission reviewed a proposed subdivision to <br />split off the Olson residence from the remaining 14 acres, leaving the large parcel as an ouilot, <br />plus two additional remainder outlots. (>ne for a private ro.id and the other tor eventual <br />acquisition by the neighbor. Ihis pri'posal lacked a continuous road outlot corridor Irom <br />Bayside Road to the large outlot parcel, since the neighboring Geffre propeny had not been <br />included in the plat. I'urther. septic testing had not been submitted for the existing Olson <br />residence with a failing system. <br />Planning Commission offered the applicant tabling until information is ci>mp!cte. The <br />applicant requested a denial recommendation in order to move the application along to the <br />Council. Planning Commission recommended denial, and recommended applicant work with <br />staff to come up with an acceptable propo.sal and provide all necessaiy intomiaiion prior to <br />Council review, After Planning Commission review, staff met w ith applicants and recommended <br />again that the Geffre property be included in the subdivision. At that point, applicants did not <br />have Geffre's approval to include him in the plat. Applicants submitted to Council a proposal <br />including a triangular easement over Geffre’s pri'periy to provide the continuous future road <br />outlot connection to the large outlot. <br />At their October 10 meeting. Council and City Attorney raised questions regarding the <br />easement vs. outlot issue and directed that Planning Commission further review^ this, with input <br />from the City Attorney regarding acceptability of the easement.