My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
09-19-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2023 3:28:31 PM
Creation date
10/19/2023 3:19:52 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
350
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
F <br />66 <br />^*£sbo5 <br />Mav 4, 1994 <br />CITYof ORONO <br />Municipal Offices <br />Street Address; <br />2750 Kelley Parkway <br />Orono. MN 55355 <br />Mailing Address.- <br />P 0. Bc< 66 <br />Crystal Bay. VN 55323-0066 <br />Mr. Patrick Wolfe <br />2871 Casco Point Road <br />Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 <br />Re: Zoning Application (t1895 <br />Dear Mr. Wolfe: <br />I have completed a preliminarv ’ review of your after-the-fact application for variances to <br />construct an accessory structure (10 ’xl2 ’ shed) on your property. The certificate of survey by <br />Otto Associates which you provided contains a wealth of information which leads me to make <br />the following comments: <br />• The survey is extremely misleading, shewing a dark line boundary that does not <br />match the legal boundary’ of your property. No addendum was provided by you <br />or your surveyor to e.xplain the format of this survey. <br />• The shed is clearly not within your property boundaries, but within the right-of- <br />way of Carman Avenue. <br />• The survey suggests a "proposed" change to your legal description which would <br />place the shed approximately 4 ’ within your property. However, you have not <br />applied for a vacation of a portion ot Carman Avenue, and if you did so, the City <br />would undoubtedly deny such a vacation given the DNR’s consistent opposition <br />to such proposals which reduce public access to lakes, and given the City s use <br />of the right-of-way as a public beach area. <br />• A site inspection reveals that the shed is approximately 8 ’ from the normal <br />shoreline (not 12 ’-14 ’ as survey shows), and obviously within 75’ of the lake <br />where no structures or hardcover are allowed. Your surveyor did not identify the <br />929.4 ’ elevation contour which is required by the City for all surveys abutting <br />Lake Minnetonka. <br />• The survey shows and site inspection verifies that your recent landscaping has <br />encroached onto the 60’ City right-of-way by as much as 20’. <br />Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX t73-«510 <br />■ ■..nrf..*—. ^ —....
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.