My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
09-19-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2023 3:28:31 PM
Creation date
10/19/2023 3:19:52 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
350
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
j 4 <br />Zoning Fik i 1914 <br />April 13. 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />Both the Traff and Colwell rcskknccs arc currently served with septic systems, although <br />Colwells' current Lot 1 is within the MUSA boundary and has a sewer stub on County Road 84 <br />approximately 900 ’ west of their existing residence <br />Plat vs. Division/Combinatioii? <br />The subdivision code gives no clear direction wl^thcr this lot lira rearrangeitKnt should <br />be structured as the divisioa'combination proposed or wtethcr it should constitute a replat into <br />two lots. It is left to tla discretion of tlK applicants and the advice of their surveyor as well as <br />requiremems of the County Surveyor’s Office as to which methixl will be acceptable. <br />Additional Information <br />TIk proposed lot line rearrangement has no impact on existing or future septic systems. <br />The proposed lot line rearrangement includes granting drainage and utility casements 5* <br />either side of the new dividing line between the propenies. The proposal di^s not specify a <br />request to vacate drainage ami utility easements along existing propeny lines. Staff has no <br />knowledge of whether certain of those easements contain existing utilities. Any future <br />application to vacate those easements would require confinnation of their current use. <br />Conceptually, however, the City would have m> objection to such a vacation. (It will be noted <br />that the conservation and flow age easement tor French Lake w etlands, while showm on the <br />original plat as drainage and utility easements, could not be vacated). <br />The proposed lot line rearrangement has no impact on setbacks for existing structures. <br />The Traff residence will continue to access onto North Shore Drive. The Colwell <br />residence will continue to access onto Old Crystal Bay Road. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />The proposed lot line rearrangement appears to meet all requirements of the RR-1 B Single <br />Family Rural Residential Zone. Staff recommends approval under either of the following options <br />to be chosen by the applicants: <br />A. lx*gal combination of all resultant parcels as a simple lot line rearrangement; or <br />B. Replat into two separate lots.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.