My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-15-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
08-15-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2023 4:01:06 PM
Creation date
10/18/2023 3:53:03 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1950 <br />August 10. 1994 <br />Pace 3 <br />Per Exhibits G and H, the addition is a single story. <br />Review E.xhibil J. accordir.i! to the Cit>-’s topographic maps, the existing house and <br />nrcposed additions will be out of the flood: plain at the 931.5 elevation. Applicant should <br />provide more detailed topographic (spot elevation) information with survey submined with <br />building permit. <br />Statement of Hardships <br />1. All five houses served by the private drive are located within the 0-75 ’ setback area, <br />refer to E.xhibit B. <br />Aoproximatelv 8.742 s.f. of utility and private driveway easement area cannot be <br />credited agaiiist lot area nor can this area be used for residential construction. <br />3.The only area available for residential construction is located entirely within the <br />lakeshore protected area. <br />4.A residence has existed on this property for over 50 years. <br />5. The property' is served with sewer. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />I. Is ihe proposed improvement too ambitious for this limited property? <br />2. <br />J- <br />Should the stmeture be moved closer to east side of easement to minimize the intensity <br />of the lakeshore setback variance? <br />What existing or proposed hardcover improvements can be reduced or removed. <br />no s.f. or 1.3% landscape area underlain with plastic <br />12’ X 22’ proposed deck at 264 s.f. or 3.1% <br />600 s.f. connecting addition at 7.2% <br />Options of Action <br />Denial of application as proposed. Refer to the necessary findings in Section 10.08, <br />Subdivision 3 (A) (1-12); <br />OR <br />}i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.