My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-15-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
08-15-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2023 4:01:06 PM
Creation date
10/18/2023 3:53:03 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1950 <br />August 10, 1994 <br />Paee 2 <br />IReiiew of Setbacks <br />A. <br />B. <br />Side setback. <br />Required = 10 ’ <br />Proposed = 11.3’ <br />No variance required. <br />Street setback. Note street lot line is located adjacent to County right-of-way <br />Required « 30 ’ <br />Existing » 71 ’ <br />No variance required. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Plat Map <br />C - Property Owners ’ List <br />D - Adjacent Neighbor ’s Acknowledgement Form <br />E-1-2 Hardcover Inventories <br />F - Survey <br />G - Street/West Elevation <br />H - Section <br />I - Floor Plan <br />J - Topographic Information <br />Description of Request <br />The applicant proposes a 20’ x 30 ’ principal structure addition with 22’ x 24’ attached <br />garage and the removal of the existing detached garage and storage shed. The entire structure <br />fs located within the 0-75 ’ setback area. Any improvements to this property w;ll require <br />hardcover and lakeshore setback approvals. The structure meets the required street and side <br />setback of the LR-IC zoning district. <br />A portion of the 20’ x 30 ’ addition and the entire deck will be located within the DNR <br />required setback for General Development Lakes at 50 ’. The DNR has been a^ed to comment <br />on the proposal. Staff will present Ceil Strauss’s comments at your meetmg^ There is adequate <br />area in the west street yard to move structural addmons out of the aO DNR required setback. <br />There is 10 ’ between the easement and the proposed 20’ x 30 ’ addition and 8 adjacent to the <br />garage. Note there is no required setback for structures from a dnveway easement. If s^emre <br />was to be moved to the edge of the easement, there would stiU be a 22-23 separation between <br />struemre and travelled driveway.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.