06-20-1994 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1933 June 16, 1994 Page 3 Review of Second Phase Subdivision I jQt Configuration All lots meet the required two acres of dry contiguous lands exclusive of designated wetlands and retention treatment ponds. Note the designated wetland within Lot 16 has not been shown as a drainage easement. The lot area should be amended to include total dry buildable exclusive of wetland area. Lots 15 and 18 (Coffin property) do not meet the required width along cul-de-sac. Lots 15. 16, 17, 18 and 19 (Dickey property) are classified as ^ough lots and conditional use permits would be required for any accessory s^cture installed at some future date. As already noted above in the factual findings. Lots 16 and 17 are served by a driveway outlot that has been placed over an existing driveway that served the Coffin residence within Lot 16. As in the first phase review, the road layout and driveway access 16 and 17 were concepnially approved by both Planning Commission and Council dunng e sketch plan review phase. The issue of applicability must be addressed in this review. A loop road connecting northern cul-de-sac road with Watertown Road would have a major impact on the designated wetland. In the conceptual review of the application, the City deemed it^t necessary to have a loop road connecting Old Crystal Bay Road to Watertown Road. The installation of a private road within the area defined as Outlot C would also ™ development, specifically adjacent to the existing driveway at the intersection of Watertown Lad. ^he north side yard of Lot 17 should be adjusted to a 45’ width. Lot 15 s side setback should be adjusted to 50 ’ adjacent to Outlot B (Coffin property). rirading/Drainage/Wetlands_ As already noted above in the status report, the only agency still to complete the re^ew of the comprehensive grading and drainage plan is the Corps. Mitigation areas have teen approved. The issue for the Corps is the resolve of the amount of fill to be placed within Lo 17 and 18 (Dickey property). There was concern with drainage coining from northeast comer of Dickey parcel eventuallv to the Luce Line. As noted by developer during the first ph^ Drive pond is proposed within Lot 8 (Dickey). Drainage will dram from 1"'^ f" dirough L DNR park under Luce Line via a 48” culvert that cames draimge throug h a swale evenmallv south along Willow (review Exhibit P). The developer shall provide incre^ Storage " apX at the northeast comer of the Dickey property to minimize any impact on existing developed properties in Countryside neighborhood. Parks/Trails/Park Dedicatioj The City will ask for a park dedication fee for the second phase subdivision. Applicant should Spond^to placement of interior trail within designated wetlands. We did not address