Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File mi\ <br />April 14, 1994 <br />Pace 3 <br />1 . Grant an easement over Lot 1 in favor of Lot 2 for the existing sewer connection, <br />a. up wetland to coLiect'm thf northerly stub. This would require <br />review and approval from a number ot agencies and a variance from the <br />b. Jack < new stub under County Road 151 at a location to avoid digging in <br />the wetland (jacking may be expensive due to other utilities in the rig <br />of-way); <br />QE <br />Move the existing connection to the southeast corner of Lot 2, to the sewer line <br />in Loma Linda.^ It appears that the Loma Linda sewer is deep enough to <br />accomplish this. If this option is chosen, then the southerly stub <br />for the new house on Lot 1. This would avoid an encroachment of the existing <br />home's sewer line across the new vacant lot. <br />Staff recommends that Option 2 be required. <br />Access <br />Existing House Setback <br />With the proposed 25’ dedication for Loma Linda, the existing house will be 33.0 from <br />the front lot line^where a 35' setback is normally required. Due to the angling of the house, <br />only a small portion will encroach the front line. Given that this is an existing situation, it is <br />essentially a Ln-issue. To avoid the technical need for a variance to Iront setback, the Ci y <br />would haw to accent less right-of-way. Staff recommends granting the front setback variance. <br />Other Utility Encroachment? <br />Anolicant should be asked to provide information on any other known utilities serving Lot <br />2 that exist within Lot 1. and if there are, how they will be dealt with. <br />View' Easement <br />AoDlicant should address the intent and purpose of the view easement proposed and <br />address What specific^^est^tionswouW^ <br />pS exists SJ the City m'unknowingly issue building permits that would violate such an <br />easement.