My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-18-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
04-18-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2023 2:50:38 PM
Creation date
10/11/2023 2:28:15 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
421
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File 11 SSI <br />April 15. 1994 <br />Page 3 <br />• Nfethods to minimize soil crosk)H and to trap sediments hefi>rr they reach any <br />surface water feature must be used. <br />• Altered areas must be subilized to acceptable erosn>n control standards. <br />. Fill or excavated material must not be placed in a manner that creates an unstable <br />slope. <br />• Plans to place fill or excasated materia* m steep slopes must be reviewed by the <br />City Engineer for continued slope subility and must not create tmished slopes ot <br />30^ or greater. O0% is approximately a 3; I slope). <br />• Fill or excavated material must not be placed in blutf impact zoiks (not a facior <br />here). <br />• Any alterations below the OHW of public waters must be authorized by the DNR <br />(DNR has confirmed no permit required). <br />• Alterations of topography must only be allowed if they are accessory to permitted <br />or coixlitional uses and do not adverse;, affect adjacent or nearby property. <br />It appears that with the revision of slopes to 3:1 at the crossing point, these standards and <br />conditions can be met. Staff would anticipate that in order to construct 3:1 slopes, the crossing <br />may have to shift 5-10 ’ westward to avoid filling into the neighboring property to the east. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit and variance for crossing the <br />creek A sueaested hardship for the variance request is that the rear ot applicants ’ property <br />cannot be suitably maintained and he has little use of that propeny without access to it. <br />Conditions ot approval should include. <br />1 Applicant to obtain a land alteration permit from the City prior to commencing <br />construction. <br />Construction on the driveway and crossing may not commence until the <br />Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has issued a permit. <br />3. <br />4. <br />Plan must be revised to include 3:1 tmished slo()es rather than 2.1 slopes. <br />Appropriate erosion control and site protection measures (i.e. "Best Management <br />Practices") shall be maintained during all phases of construction.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.