Laserfiche WebLink
• •//v/x? ccey ciry CT^ <br />Memorandum <br />TO:Webber Kills Homeowr.ers <br />FROM:Tom McC—"c <br />DATE:Septemu?r6. 1995 <br />SUBJECT: Septic Svsie;n/?vlunic:pal Server Issue- <br />An informational meeting for ail neighbors was held at our home on May 17. »99o. to <br />better understand the reasons %vhy the majority' ot the trench-t%pe septic s% stems .n <br />Weboer Kills have been deemed non-coniorming over the last year and mound-type <br />systems are bein2 required immediately tor anyone who sells their property' or obtains a <br />buildins permit and for essentially everyone in the r’rea by the end of 1996. Our <br />neichborhood initiated this meeting with the City ot Orono officials, which was the tirsr <br />of its type. Subsequentlv. all 9 other Orono neighborhoods have had similar meetings, <br />which were all held at the Orono city oftices. <br />Our meetinc was attended by Diann Goetten. Orono CikV Council Member, and die <br />inibrmational portion %vas led by \Iike Gatfron, Assistant Zoning Administrator. .A, <br />packer of materials was distnbuted by .Mr. Gaf&on iOentify'ing various priority areas <br />(neighborhoods) in Orono for city sewer. Ke indicated that a -rypicar mo-and syste.m <br />would cost 57.000 - 510,000 while city sewer is estimated at S13,9SO/household <br />(assessed at an average of approximately 51,100/year over 15 years) plus an initial hook- <br />UD cost of 52.000 - 54,000, plus a quanerly sewage use/maintenance fee. <br />* <br />Tne additional enclosed packet of information, which is more complete and descriptive <br />than the information distributed on \Iay I /, explains the teenmeal issues involved. This <br />packet was recently prepared for the Foxhill and Bay Ridge neighborhoods. <br />Tne initial parar.c ‘r and primary’ reason for our meeting was the premise that we would <br />ail be required t ' install mound-type septic systems and then pote.ntially stUl incur all of <br />die attendant costs of city sewer relatively soon thereafter. <br />Tne second maior concern was the fact that the requirement for the mound-type system <br />would result in a gre'.' majority ’ of the trees being cut down in the area and 35 large ugly <br />systems would be inTtalled, essentially ruining the visual character of the neighborhood <br />and decreasing property values for ail of us. As noted, nothing but grass can be planted <br />on a mound system and the riser pipes remain exposed.