12-11-1995 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Request for CoOncil Action continued Page 2 December 4, 1995 Zoning File #1958 Louis Obrhauser. 2405 Dunwoody Avenue, 3865/3877 Shoreline Dri\e The applicant proposes a lot line rearrangement and rcplat of three substandard parcels that originally contained four residential structures. The areas of each of the three existing properties range from 7,600 s.f. to 16,900 s.f. Proposed Lot 1 consists ot 16.500 s.t. and Lot 2 of 20.000 s.f. Applicant's oricinal proposal requests hardco\er variances within the 0-75' setback area for new construction. New construction on Lot 1 would encroach the lakeshore setback line by 6'. The garage addition for the new residence on Lot 1 would be located 10' from the street lot line. The existing detached garage encroaches 6' into the County right-ot-way. The residence structure on Lot 2 will not encroach the lakeshore setback area but applicant's development plan shows retention of timber landscape walls in the lakeshore yard also requiring hardcover variance approvals in the 0-75' zone for Lot 2. Lot 2’s residence structure will meet all other required setbacks. Hardcover excesses have been greatly reduced in the 75-250' setback area. For Lot 1 there is a 2,614 s.f. or 23.031"o reduction and for Lot 2 a 449 s.f. or 3.5% reduction, A sUTJCtural coverage variance would also be required for Lot 1 proposed at 15.6% where 15% is allowed. Lot 2 is proposed at 10.6“i. Refer to Exhibits P and Q, both the County (Exhibit H) and the City Engineer's office (Exhibit I) have recommended a shared access at Shoreline Drive as opposed to the use of a Dunwoody access for Lot 2 because of its proximity to the intersection of Dunwoody and Shoreline. Applicant shall prov ide an amended plan locating a shared access and the realignment of the shared lot line along the new curb cut at Shoreline Drive. Review Exhibit J. applicant's final plat must locate the municipal sewer line that intersects property at shoreline and along the west lot line of proposed Lot 1. The City Engineer shall determine required width of the utility easement. Mr. Neveaux. applicant's representative at the Planning Commission meeting, advised that it is Mr. Oberhauser's goal to demolish the residences as soon as the Cit>- has resolved the replat subdivision and variances to be granted for the new construction. If applicant proceeded with an immediate final plat, staff would recommend that applicant enter into a subdivider's agreement and post a letter of credit to assure the removal of structures no later than April 1, 1996. If applicant does not plan to file the final plat but to delay final action of the Council. Council may decide as a condition of the preliminaiy plat approval and conceptual approval of variances for the new development that applicant agree to the removal of the structures by April 1st and to execute a subdivider's agreement and post the letter of credit as a condition of preliminary plat approval.