12-11-1995 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE WO^ SESSION TTFT n WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 11, 199s of spaces to place on this or any specific ^ „ maximize the number siven the amount of money spent m acquiring this site they luii an p 5f spaces possible while addressmg all of the other - ^ space acquisition of the remauung three parce.s would ^ ,, ,5 d NR ’s intent and yield a lower overall percenoge of hardcover. ultimately have to to build an access that addresses the City s cnvironm . . ^ justif ed, hence the number satisfy the LCMR that the appropriation of money tor this project is justit.eu, of spaces is importam. Goetten commented that the 45-50-/60-63- DNR Should keep that in mind. Schroeder added Uia ih4 Cit^ha^^^^^ —d r uTmT^^ant in this site redevelopment that we end up with sometliing better than was there betore. Hurt commented that it is wS be'^placed disallowing show relatively few car only spaces. example on Prior Lake where the lack Ser is not Jn R's initial intent to place such si<^nage at this access. oL.c*. "y S November 1 and 2 e) is not ideal because the boats must be backed with with the -reverse circulation ^3 window. The November 1 plan driver looking over his ng spaces and lO-car only spaces. He noted would better circulation pattern with counterclockwise flow, that the Novembe - P'“ P™ ' ^ xhis provides ability to back down the ramp similar 10 Concept P'""" ° ^ contains Mgled head-in parking on the nonh and spaces and about 8 car-only spaces. Gaffron asked whether there is any difference in hardcover benveen the November 1 and 2 plans. Linnell felt they were about equal. , a- U oi-arsd ^how a sinc^ic "make readv" dock to one side plus two Linnell commented that ^3= 3,03, ukel'y those two will end up outside additional bet\veen r^p -_^'^^ experience has shown that the configuration as draw^s^ineri-mie^becaus boats remain in the way of the next launcher while trailers are bemg parked, etc.