Laserfiche WebLink
V. <br />2. <br />A <br />^1 <br />4. <br />6. <br />7. <br />Ushtini. We agree with havicg ligating ju« at <br />Tonkav^a. The Ughting should be directed downward per your pre <br />Sunitar/ facUiiies. We agree with the “ceept of site, <br />b sareiaed eacics-ures. We note dte P “Jf (^v*; dunk a fountain <br />WUl you provide a fouatam or on be <br />•rgr^Lf;;™ ^ <br />we don-r want picnic tables or beaches on the site initiaUy. but a few beaches <br />might be a future consideration. <br />We would like to see an attractive. ti <br />nonglotaeratton of individual s.gns a.nd posts we fi-d <br />vfoo'deu sign board of some son. <br />We would like the site to be posted "No Swimaiing'. <br />We are coucenred“issir« asss-r—-»-»- <br />IDcelv be minimal. <br />. , ,h„ be-e should be some e.xteaded (50--60-)-make-ready" <br />o It seems logical to us iha • please address this.'■ docks e.xteading away from the ramp area, fie <br />Ea>'irorjnental Concerns • . i >, <br />. fh-it our 75 ’ minimum lakeshcre setback is cnticd m <br />.ajthougia we fee! strongly tha o^. '= proposed 45’-65 ’ setbacks trom <br />maintaining the shoreiand 2°^°'^ ^ provide a better situation than currently <br />OHWL, while not meetmg that Cod.,, P <br />exist at the site. <br />rwf fhf. art stormwater controls (site grading, ponds. <br />«:.)tel 'St-“"‘P' P‘“- <br />S’.be rip rapping the eume shorelrae... <br />. 1. remonsibiuty for restoration of Gayle’s illegal dredging. The <br />Will DNR take involvement in this.City wants no responsiOUity ot <br />. • fhTt Hennepin County has told us about concrete obstructions out <br />ftS’t s! wUch we assume you wiU warn to remove. <br />1. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5.