Laserfiche WebLink
» . <br />B. <br />F. <br />I. <br />Major portions of the property recei\'c excessive runoff from Long Lake <br />Boulevard during heavy rains and the majorit>- of runoff pools in the <br />grassed, flatter elevations at the shoreline of this property. <br />The majority of hardcover from the stairs and timber walls within the 0- <br />75 ’ setback area was approved b}’ the City in The stairs installed <br />at a 4 ’ width is allowed on a property with steep elevations. <br />C. The deck is unsafe and in ne *d of major repair or replacement. <br />D. There is a concrete patio beneath the deck. <br />E. The deck will have no impact on the lake views of adjacent residences. <br />Removal of plastic underliner in the gentle or more flatter sloped areas <br />of the property will allow for greater absorption of runoff from the road <br />and higher elevations to the north. <br />In the City Engineer's report of December 4, 1995. Shawn Gustafson <br />notes that the removal of the plastic underliner from rock patio and <br />timber wall landscape bo.xes will result in "very little potential for <br />erosion". He also notes that runoff infiltration would be increased in <br />these flatter sloped areas. <br />The City approved variances in 1968 and 1972 to allow residential <br />construction on this severely substandard parcel. <br />Hardcover in the 0-75' setback area has K*en reduced from 16.29% to 8% <br />and in the 75-250' setback area from 87.35% to 83.7%. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property ’ arc peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variances would not adversely affect traflic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />Page 2 of 5