My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-27-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
11-27-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 3:03:38 PM
Creation date
10/6/2023 3:01:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,1995 <br />^#7 • #2057 Jirncs Nj'stron! • Continued) <br />Frazee said the pix)blcni with meeting! the side setback lies with the desire to keep a low <br />DTotile. an understated cottase look, so as not to dominate the neighborhood To <br />decrease the floor plan would cause the applicant to build a two-storv to gain the needed <br />space Frazee asked the Council to reconsider their decision, taking into account the <br />beneflts gained bv the proposal, concessions and expenses made, especially the house <br />being moved out of the 75' zone <br />Nystrom commented that the house and garage as they exist are contrarv' to the City <br />comprehensive plan He felt he was taking a proactive approach with his proposal. <br />Nystrom said he was only asking for 12" to ma.ximize his space as he does not wish to <br />have a two-storv home <br />Callahan noted that the three Council members present at the prior application review <br />were Kelley, Hurr, and himself <br />Gaflron added that there w as also the issue of the overhang. The code allow s for a 1-1/2* <br />overhang. The proposed overhang is 2 2’ with the additional 6" variance resulting in a 7- <br />1/2* setback from the drip line to the lot line With the additional variance. Gaflron said <br />there is still a better setback from the south but closer on the north side It was noted <br />that one side of the residence is available for emergency vehicles to go around <br />Hurr said, because in replacement we consider this as a new lot, she saw no hardship to <br />allow the house to not meet code Even with the positive changes. Hurr felt it would set <br />a bad precedent to allow the variances <br />Callahan noted that with the bad situation as is represented by the property now, the <br />chamies result in many positives Frazee added that the applicant was also taking a <br />perfectly good garage and rebuilding it to meet hardcover goals <br />Goetten questioned why the house cannot be redesigned as the overage is only 6 ” on <br />each side Frazee said the interior would be afl'ected bv 1' and would result in too narrow <br />a headroom in the master bedroom with the slanted walls 1 he master bedroom width <br />was said to be 15* with the slope beginning at 4'6" Nystrom said he realized the Planning <br />Commission and Council made exceptions in other cases and asked that it also be done <br />here A neiuhborinu property was cited as an example but noted to have uained a <br />variance due to a drainage problem. <br />Hurr commented that a variance requires a condition under which there be a hardship, <br />not self-created. Frazee reitereaied the need to maintain a low profile and not overpower <br />the neiuhborhood. <br />!L...1.1 A f...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.