My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-27-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
11-27-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 3:03:38 PM
Creation date
10/6/2023 3:01:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OK THE REGULAR ORONO CUT COUNCIL <br />MEETLNG HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,1995 <br />/JLi. CSuHivan, Council Direction * Continued) <br />Goeften inquired about a possible purchase of the church property by O Sullivan He <br />informed her that he has an ootion to ourchase the orooertv continaent on rczoninu <br />Four potential site plans arc currently being dravsn. O’Sullivan said he would meet with <br />City StafTonce the plans are done. Plans include retail and office space A meeting wUl <br />also take place with nciahbors of the propertv <br />(•#5) #2022 R. MELAMED/R. LAl'ER, 920 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH <br />- FINAL SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3629 <br />Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3629 Vote: Ayes 5. Nays 0. <br />(*#6) #2031 BRUCE R. KELLY, 2340 FOX STREET - PRELIMINARY <br />SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3630 <br />Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3630. V oie; Aves 5, Navs 0. <br />I#7) #2057 JAMES NYSTROM. 1745 CONCORDIA STREET - VARIANCES <br />REQUEST FOR RECONSIUERXI ION <br />Mr. Nystrom and his architect, Greg Frazee. were present <br />Gafi'ron reported that the Council had moved to reconsider the application at the October <br />23 meetinu The existing house with deck is mainly located within the 0-75’ zone with a <br />detached garage and drivewav The initial Planning Commission review lead to applic^t <br />oroDOsing removal of the house and garage and replacement The Council approved the <br />application with conditions that no encroachment of the 0-75' zone occur and minimum <br />10’ setbacks be met on each side of the home. The applicant requests a variance for a <br />lesser siue seioacK <br />Fra/ce commented that the applicant responded to the requests of the Planning <br />Commission to meet certain reouiremenis The application was then unanimouslv <br />recommended for approval by the Planning Commission but rejected by the Council. <br />Frazee was of the opinion that the Planning Commission saw the many positives that <br />would take place with the proposal for the propertv, but the Council did not do the same, <br />Frazee reviewed the current layout of the hou.se and garage on the lot. The house is <br />located 23’ from the shoreline and 1.6’ from the side setback with the garage on the lot <br />line The neighborine house is located on the lot line Frazee said Nystrom liked the <br />closeness to the lake but saw the need for update and realized the problem with <br />hardcover dunnu the Planning Commission review 1 he proposal was then amended to <br />include a new house built at the 75’ line The garage, which is currently side loading with <br />alot of driveway hardcover, would be centered on the lot with one parking stall off to the <br />side eliminating the majority of the hardcover <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.