My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
11-13-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 2:47:53 PM
Creation date
10/6/2023 2:37:15 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
599
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 16, 1995 <br />(#9 - #2066 Robert and Ins VVaade - Continued) <br />Schroeder noted that the proposal was an improvement, but asked whatit would take to <br />reduce the lot coveraee down to 15%, or a 100 s.f. reduaion Tne app cam respon e <br />that It would be difficult to condense the plan an>' funher and still maintain a decent tio <br />plan. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Hawn moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2066 subjea <br />recommendauons with removal of the excess bituminous matenal m tne y-ard proteaion <br />of the septic system, removal of hardcover as noted, and an insuec^ion ot nar <br />removals prior to oouruig of the footings. Vote: .Ayes -t. Nays 1. Peterson, v o <br />adiowledge the applicant’s attempt to reduce hardcover but was ot the leelmg n was still <br />too®dmbitious a proposal for the lot. <br />(#10) #2074 JOHN AND KRISTEN GEHRING, 1687 STI^ET - <br />VARIANCES - CONDITIONAL USE PERNDT - PUBLIC HEARING /.lO-/. <br />P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and .Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />The aLoiicants were present* * <br />The application consists of two pans. Mabusth reponed that the first pan involves a <br />condidonal use permit and vanance to install 2‘ timber wall along the lakeshore bank. Ice <br />movement in early spnng has created problems along this shoreline. is similar <br />the wall on the Palm propeny to the nonh. The Engmeer has reviewed the applicmion. <br />Staff is of the opinion that the vail is not a permanent solution to the erosion problem ^d <br />has encouraized the applicants id consider np rap. The applicants do not wisn to io^ their <br />sandv beachT which would occur u np rap was mstalled There is no room to ^ter the <br />bank'itself with only 41' to the residence fi-om the lakeshore. Staff said the wall will work <br />but not penTLanently. <br />Mabusth reported that the second pan of the application is for the instaJation of a 2^0^^ <br />detached earage located m the street yard ot the property. The g^^ge would <br />side se’back The doors of the garage would open to the street. . ne garage would be <br />nlaced M' from Concordia, where 30’ is required Mabusth sard ihanhere rs concern with <br />L tlood Dlam b-mi: encroached bv the strucmre. The raaionty ot dramage m the <br />ConLdia nenthborltood drams to this area and includes the Palm ProP'ny, Runoff flows <br />eventuallv to Wes. Amt The apphcan. connrmed wrdi a new survey ttot the flood plain ,s <br />!m<roachcd bv at least half of .he structure. The Palm’s garage would be flooded rf <br />“mpensarorv or matching excavations are no. completed. If this ts true, permits would <br />b™equTred from both the Corp of Enmneers and the Watershed. <br />13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.