My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-23-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
10-23-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 2:07:26 PM
Creation date
10/6/2023 2:04:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
minutes of the orono planning commission meeting <br />HELD HAY 17, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE »TS20 - CCN7. <br />existing -ooden sea'^sli «.th steel. ?,V, „;s unaware <br />issued and the reoairs re'auired and thought any <br />that a new ccndit.cnal , , ^o^rov^d conditional use <br />reoa.rs would fall under tne sDoNcation is <br />permit. She oo.ntec out the r-ect‘.ng the quality of <br />the "V;; ^Tr?.ng lot- she noted the City would <br />run-off to the lake . rom .he - .«• -go-i coating season and <br />like to see scmetn.ng m place En^heer. The <br />referred to Jl ,n them to determine <br />rc7"o^!.o'n®7,*mos*t t7aor.'" She sugsested th. Watershed District <br />Should also da asked to covenant. <br />e conditioned upon on-going maintananca <br />currently being done by the County. <br />Nolan suggested aoproval <br />of the area. <br />Mabusth explained that is <br />w we =nhwia*-f. seconded by Peterson, to recommend <br />ir -2';“ ^,/;iVon' .1327“" County Deoartment o <br />:^L.nrei M.nUtme^t North Arm Access, acoroving a conditional <br />re'per:ft"'an'd "Ta:re7or the repair of an existing seawall, per <br />staff’s recommendation. Ayes 7, nays 0. <br />(#4) S1822 MARK PRUETER, <br />3215 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - <br />VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING <br />The Af fIoav1t of ?uol ication and <br />7:11 - 7:34. P.M. <br />Cert Ificate of Mai I ing were noted. <br />„r. and Mrs. Frueter were orerent for this acolication. <br />wi ewea .-^rni icants request side setback, and <br />Mabusth expiaine- ^o the rear of the existing <br />hardcover Average ! akeshore setback variance to allow <br />rep'laceme^tTf an exist ing i akeshore dec^ proposed at 18x10.6’. The <br />deck area will be reduced. <br />o wxsr stared they nope to make this their permanent <br />Mr. Pruete more living space for future family additions.residence but nee^d^ more house was <br />He pointed ^ adootion of the current zoning ordinances, <br />constructed ^ j \ and available on either side and the <br />There is no to the project. He testified that the <br />neignpors do house to the garage is necessary because of <br />pS^n^ irrh.r:rer and^he hopel to address this issue.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.