My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-25-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
09-25-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 1:18:13 PM
Creation date
10/6/2023 1:14:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINirrES OF THE REGUL^iR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 11,1995 <br />(#7 - #2048 James & Joann Jundt - Cominued) <br />It was noted that this is the sixth application by the applicants. <br />Caflahan moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3599. Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />(#8) #2050 WILLIAM TOLES, 3165 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #3600 <br />The applicant was not present but was represented by the realtor for the property. <br />Gaflron reported that the application is for hardcover and average lakeshore setback <br />variances. The property was subject to a variance application in 1988 The current <br />hardcover calculations match that which were approved in 1988 The proposed pool <br />would be 115’ from the shoreline. The average lakeshore setback is defined by the house <br />to the northeast, and the house on the west, which is set back. Gaflron said there would <br />be no impact on these neighboring homes <br />The hardcover calculations shows 33.1% e.xisting in the 75-250' zone, where 25% is <br />allowed, and is proposed at 32 5®/o The reduction in hardcover will be acquired through <br />the removal of 1390 s f of landscape fabric and plastic and 400 s.f of concrete and wood <br />patio. <br />The pool was looked at as structure The Planning Commission recommended approval <br />of the application with reductions as noted in hardcover. The applicant was asked to <br />reduce more hardcover if this w as possible. <br />Hurr said she .saw no problem with the average lakeshore setback but saw no hardship to <br />add to the structural hardcover Hurr asked if there was anywhere to reduce the amount <br />of hardcover Gaflron said any further removal would aflect the house or driveway. <br />It was noted that this application was for a hardcover variance only, not a structural <br />coverage variance The structural coverage is at I l°'o with the proposed pool GatTron <br />said the review of hardcover and structure was made due to the issue of non-structural <br />versus structural hardcover issue with landscape beds and plastic underlayment. <br />Hurr asked for clarification of the reduction of non-structural and decking by 400'. <br />GatTron said the reduction is from a patio 2’ above grade. The 400 s f in patio would be <br />in exchange for the 1500 s f pool. There is a net reduction in non-structural hardcover <br />of 137 s f with the removal of 1390 s.f of plastic and fabric.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.