My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-25-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
09-25-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 1:18:13 PM
Creation date
10/6/2023 1:14:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 11,1995 <br />(U6~ #2045 John Steinmetz - Continued <br />The applicant was present. <br />Hurr inquired if the County had the adequate right-of-way. Mabusth said the County did <br />have the adequate right-of-way with 66', adding that most of the road is located on the <br />east 33' Mabusth said Dave Zetterstrom from Hennepin County was unable to give any <br />minimum setback from the road but did say the distance from the traveled road was <br />adequate. <br />Callahan noted that an adjustment was made at the Planning Commission regarding the <br />size of the porch. Mabusth said the porch was to be 8' with 10’ at the roof line with a 2* <br />overhang and located at the 0' lot line. <br />Hurr moved, Callahan seconded, to approve Resolution #3598 <br />(#7) #2048 JAMES & JOANN JUNDT, 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD - <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMiT/VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3599 <br />Scott Crawford of Kraus Anderson Construction represented the applicants <br />Mabusth reported that the application is for a third residential unit in the oversized <br />accessory structure tor a studio apartment, which already contains a 3-bedroom, 2-level, <br />caretaker unit and a 2-bedroom guest house The one room studio will bnng the total <br />bedrooms to si.\, all of which w ill be ser\ ed by one septic system <br />The application was approved by the Planning Commission with conditions placed on the <br />septic systems The sewage system was to have been updated by the 1995 construction <br />season. A petition for sewer is under consideration The Planning Commission has asked <br />for septic testing every two months If failure is found, the system must be pumped out <br />on a reuular basis Limitations would be placed on the property should this fail. <br />Kelley asked if StafFknew where the septic tank was located. Mabusth said they did, and <br />it has been found not to meet the separation required Tests have been conducted to <br />show there is adequate area to serve the usage. Kelley asked what would occur it the <br />MUSA line is not extended to this area A new septic system would be installed. <br />Mabusth suggested stipulating a deadline date for installation of septic should the MUSA <br />line amendment fail Callahan asked if the applicant agreed to update the septic in the <br />original resolution .Mabusth said this was true Callahan said no deadline should then be <br />needed <br />Hurr asked what kind of septic was on the site at present. There are two mound-type <br />septic systems, one for the main residence and one for the accessory structures. Four <br />septic sites were tested. Hurr asked if it is realistic to have six-bedrooms within the <br />accessorv structure, and Mabusth said it was.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.