Laserfiche WebLink
c.The City’s tax records back to 1974 indicate the former owner received <br />homestead credit from 1974 to 1981. The propert>- has been non- <br />homesieaded to the current time. <br />D.Major portions of the propeny are located in the lakeshore protected area. <br />5,348 s.f. is located within the 0-75 ’ setback area and 1,464 s.f. is located <br />within the 75-250 ’ setback area. <br />E.The curvature of the shoreline to the southeast of the property intensifies <br />the impact of the lakeshore setback upon limited building envelope of this <br />property. <br />F.The property has been assessed and is connected to municipal sewer, <br />The Planning Commission at their August 21, 1995 meeting reconsidered a <br />second request of applicant to install a second story' over the 22 x ^2 single­ <br />story garage. The Planning Commission recommended denial of applicant’s <br />request to" amend the Planning Commission’s original recommendation of <br />approval based on the following findings: <br />A.A second story over the approved 22’ x 22’ garage addition would <br />intensify the impact of struemre on this severely substandard lot. <br />B.The garage is located 3* from a public access to laJce and 5.4 ’ from street <br />lot line. <br />ITie City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />Granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a "fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preser\e a substantial property- <br />right of the applicant; and would be in keeping w ith the spirit and intent of the <br />Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 3 of 7