09-11-1995 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2U)ning File #2057 August 16, 1995 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - F - G • H -r ' Summary Application Plat Map Property Owners ’ List Survey (Existing) Survey (Proposed/Existing) Topography/Average Setback Line Hardcover Calculations by Applicant Plan and Elevation Views ^ Mr. Nvstrom appeared before the Planning Commission in April with a proposal for additions to the existing residence, which is located 35’ from the lake and h^ a deck „3 from the lake. The Planning Commission tabled that application in order tor applicant to revise his plans. Applicant now proposes to remove the existing residence and replace it with new construction. This presents the opportunity for construction meeting all City requirements upon granting of the necessary lot area and lot width variances. Additionally, however, applicant requests a number ot variances, including: 9 5’ side setbacks instead of the required 10’. Also, the proposed 2.2 overhangs will place the drip line 7.5’ from the side lot lines where the normal 1.5' non encroachment allowance would leave the drip line 8.5 ’ from the lot line. While the house itself w'ill meet the 75’ lake>hore setback, a deck is proposed at 65’ from the shoreline. This deck results in hardcover in the 0-75’ zone where none would normally ^ allowed In the 75-250’ zone, hardcover is proposed at 31% where only -5% would nonnally be allowed. In the 250-500’ zone, relocation/reconstruction ot the detached garage and reorientation of the driveway and parking area results in an increased hardcover percentage, although the net hardcover area devoted to driveway and garage will decrease significantly. Due to the location of the neighboring house to the north, there is still technically an encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line. 1