My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-11-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
09-11-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 12:48:21 PM
Creation date
10/6/2023 12:43:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6. <br />7. <br />The City Staff and City Engineer have conceptually approved the <br />drainage/grading plan and road plan for the subdivision as shown on drawings <br />prepared by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. dated August 1, <br />1995, Job #95-233, Sheet 1 ofl. <br />At the August 21. 1995 meeting of the Planning Commission, members <br />rccommerKied unanimous approval of a variance to Section 11.33. Subdivision 4 <br />of the Subdivision Regulations that would allow Lots 1. 2 and 3 to be served by <br />a private road outlot with cul-de-sac and Lot 4 shall continue to be served at the <br />existing curb cut at Watenown Road that sened the original homestead, based on <br />the following unique findings and hardships: <br />a.The curb cut at the '•oad outlot and existing curb cut at Watertown Road <br />have been approved by the City Engineer as meeting the required sighting <br />distance for roadways at a 40 m.p.h. speed limit. <br />There is adequate dry buildable area to design a subdivision with a road <br />outlot along the east lot line. The proposed access plan has been proposed <br />in order to preserve the natural amenities of this property. <br />The proposed access plan will allow an extensive wooded area at the <br />southeast comer of the property to remain undisturbed. <br />Placement of a road along the east line would result in a major impact <br />upon the existing steeper elevations as one moves north along the east lot <br />line. <br />f. <br />g <br />In the review of the Peterman Addition, the residential development to the <br />imic. te east, the City determined that an extension road outlot to the <br />subt»f ’ .foperty would not be required by the developer. <br />i: CO. nning road was developed along the east lot line. I^^ts 1-4 of the <br />elerm,. I Addition and three of the lots within the current division would <br />become tnrough lots requiring all property owners to obtain conditional <br />use permits for construction of all accessory structures. <br />If a confonning road was installed along the east lot line. Lot 4 would <br />now be surrounded by a roadway on all three sides. <br />Pace 2 of 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.