Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2050 <br />August 15, 1995 <br />Page 4 <br />Based on the above, the 20’ x 35’ pool plus the 6’ patio around it is considered__as <br />structural hardrij^vpr proposed to be offset by removals of non-structural hardcover (rockbeds <br />with plastic or fabric and a concrete patio area not associated with the pool, which may or may <br />not be considered structural hardcover). <br />Structural Mon-Strucmral Total, <br />1995 Existing: <br />0-75’ <br />75-250’ <br />250-500’ <br />0 s.f. <br />4,350 s.f. <br />315 s.f. <br />4.665 s.f. <br />0 s.f. <br />4,745 S.f. <br />4.070 s.f. <br />8,815 S.f. <br />0 s.f. <br />9,095 s.f. <br />4.385 s.f. <br />13,480 s.f. <br />1995 Proposed; <br />0-75’ <br />75-250’ <br />250-500’ <br />0 s.f. <br />6,003 s.f. <br />315 s.f. <br />6,318 s.f. <br />0 s.f. <br />2,955 s.f. <br />4.070 s.f. <br />7,025 s.f. <br />0 s.f. <br />8.958 s.f. <br />4.385 s.f. <br />13,343 s.f. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />Do the proposed hardcover removals (1.390 s.f. of landscape areas and 400 s.f. <br />of concrete and wood patio) compensate for the new hardcover associated with <br />the pool? <br />Are there additional items of structural or non-structural hardcover in the 75-250’ <br />or 250-500' zones that could be removed? <br />Does the fact that there will be no hardcover within 115 ’ of the lake suggest a <br />unique justification for the variance? ^ <br />Does the overall proposed hardcover of jult under 22% for the entire property, <br />compared to the DNR’s standard of 25%, enter into the picture? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Planninc Commission should review the findings of the previous resolution as well as the <br />applicant's hardship statement in the application form. Any motion to recommend approval <br />should address the average setback variance as well as the hardcover issues, detailmg your <br />findings of hardship and specifying any hardcover removals that should be required. <br />Isv ^ r <br />L T t:5 fV <br />t * * ^