08-14-1995 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JLXY 17, 1995 (#5 - U203A Mary A Gene Zulk - Continued) Smith moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2034 for a covered deck additicHi to the street side \^ith removal of the stoiw patio on the northeast. ith the disclaimer of allowing no additional structural improvements on the property in the future without the removal of existing structure. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#6) #2036 ROBERT J. GOUTANIS, 1098 LOMA LINDA AVENUE - VARL4NCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:01-8:37 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr Goutanis was present. Mabusth reported that the original residence was built in 1934 The garage encroaches 6" into the public right-of-way. which is a lakeshore access uswl year arcnind with a swimming dock Structural failings have been found within the existing foundation The applicant proposes 3x8 ’ rounding off of the structure at the southeast and northeast comers The applicant has proposed three options by which to proceed and is asking for a recommendation from the Planning Commission as to which option they would approve Case #l would involve partial foundation repairs at the lakeside with an renovation of the fust floor only. Tlie condition of the remaining foundation would not enable any expansion of the second floor Case #2 involves a complete replacement of the foundation Both cases I and 2 would require the house to be raised In this case, improvements would also be made to the second floor level, all within the same footprint There would be a slight encroachment of the lakeshtire yard by the steps and stoop of 4 ’ The detached garage would stay the same at 24x22', as in case #1, w ith side relocation of the garage door. The 6" encroachment would remain. Hardcover statistics reflect the increase in hardcover \ side setback variance is needed in this case Case #3 would relocate the home fimher away from the lake with the same footprint. It would improve the left side setback to 10’. where house is 6-1/2' from lot line The garage would be the same but would now be attached and still encroach 6" The upper level improvements would now include a deck to the lakeside This would not involve any encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line as it would not e.xtend beyond the given footprint located tlirther away from lake Lindquist asked if the Commission could approve an application that encroaches on the public righl-of-wav Mabusth leplied that she would hope ilii.s wxiuld not occur