Laserfiche WebLink
\IINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JLXY 17, 1995 <br />(#4 - i^2033 Donald & Arlene Kielley - Continued) <br />Rowktte said a ade variance prefented no problem in her view as the next residence over <br />was a fair distance away. <br />Lindquia moved, Rowlette seconded, to approve Application #2033 with the condition <br />that all plastic areas be removed as well as the concrete and gravel areas The removal of <br />the rock on the north side will be dependent on Staff findings concerning drainage. It shall <br />be ftmher noted that this woula be the maximum amount of struaural coverage allowed <br />on this propertv' in the fijture without removal of existing staicture Ayes 4, Nays 0 <br />(#5) #2034 MARY AND GENE ZULK, 1400 CHERRY PIACE - V ARIANCES - <br />PUBUC HEARING 7;5I-8:0I P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication w ere noted. <br />Mr Zulk was present. <br />This application is for a 10x26’ covered deck addition on the street side A structural <br />coverage variance is required. Structural coverage exists at 17 6®o, allowed at 15’o. and <br />is proposed at 19 9®V for an increase of 265 s f. or 2 3% Mabusth reported that <br />hardcov'cr can be reduced in the 75*250' zone with the removal ot a rock patio at <br />northeast side of residence of 175 s 1 Hardcov er exists at 49.2® b, proposed at 51.8/ o, tor <br />an additional 213 s f, or 2.64®® No side setback variance is required <br />Mabusth asked the applicant if there was any existing hardcover areas that could be <br />removed to offset the hardcover amount. Zulk said he had no drainage problems and <br />suggested removal of the stone patio on the northeast side <br />Lindquist asked about the walkway on the nonh side of the propeny This was found to <br />be used to access the lower level There are stairs to access this level, and Zulk said the <br />sidewalk underneath could be removed, but decking will be placed over this area. <br />Lindquist said, although he wav unhappy with additional hardcover, he saw no area where <br />removal could be done to offset the new Mabusth noted with the removal of the 175 s.f <br />or 2 2®/® of patio hardcover, there would be an overall reduaion in hardcover This results <br />in less hardcover than originally existed <br />There were no public comments. <br />Commission asked that a disclaimer be added to the resolution allowing no more structural <br />improvements on this propeny m the future without removal of existing structures.