My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-26-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
06-26-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 10:48:39 AM
Creation date
10/6/2023 10:46:03 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. City of Lon7 T.nVe Wgt Dg^ent ’on Bj^ins/Wetlands: <br />The drainage ditch running through the site, drains approxim^ely 613 awes and rans through an <br />existing segmentation basin pnor to discharging to Long Lake. An addition^ 20 ac^ or drainage .s <br />routed to a second existing sedimenution basin prior to dischargmg to Long Lake. TTie project <br />involves enlar^^ and deepening the two existing basins and routing the larger drainage area through <br />both basins pnor m discharge to Long Lake. TTie projea is designed for the pu^ose of improving <br />water aualitv in Long Lake. The design report prepared tor the projea is May 1995 estimates that the <br />phosphorus VemovaJ efficiency of the basins are approximately *0 percent. <br />4. Lon? Lake Alum Treanrenr <br />TTie projea wUl not change the quantity or quality of surface water runoff. <br />19. Water Quality - Wastewaters <br />a. Describe sources, quannries. and composition (except for normal domestic sewage) of all sanUary and <br />industrial wastewaters produced or treated at the site. <br />Not applicable. <br />h. Describe am y«sste matment methods to be used and five estimates t^amposition t^r tre^nt or <br />if the projea involves on-site treatment sy stems, discuss the suitability of the sue condinoru for sue <br />systems. Identify receiving waters (including ground water) andestimme the ! <br />on the quality of the receiving waters. (If the discharge may affea a .ake consult EAW Guidelines <br />about whether nutrient budget analysis is needed.) <br />Not applicable. <br />c. If wastes will be discharged into a sewer system or pretreatment system, identify the system and discuss <br />the ability of the system to accept the volume and composition of the wastes. Identify any <br />improvements which will be necessary. <br />Not applicable. <br />20. Ground Water - Potential for Contanunation <br />a. Approximate depth (in feet) to groundwater: -----minimum^ <br />1. rniintv Road No 6 Wet Detention Basin/Wetland: <br />average. <br />minimum;1 ft. average. <br />2. ppgr Hill Rnad Wet Detention Basin/Wetland: <br />minimum;1 ft. average. <br />3_ ritv of Long Lake Wet Detention Basins/Wetland: <br />minimum;4 ft.average. <br />HtM)! t5>0*-aWVLaneUi»XA W.A£S-0»Page 16 of 24 5/24/95
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.