Laserfiche WebLink
«*• <br />J. <br />4. <br />b. <br />1. <br />7 <br />4>P* • <br />, •• r’jrtntf before arJ after the projea. Describe methods to beampare the irJ q'Miiiry cf .ue rjnoff etpre or , <br />used to manage and/or treat runoff. <br />ronnfv Road ^ Wgt D>»rpnnon Ba^jp/We^laPiL <br />P.ie« 00. ■ ec: <br />phospoorou. removal efficiency offfie combined Deer HUl Road and <br />Counr/ Road No. 6 Basins is approximately PO percent. <br />Hill Ro^H \V>t Deter.ron Ba^^inAVetland: <br />1. ..«»;«/ nf <;ita runoff The project is designed for the purpose or <br />The project will not 0^=? v J jj,,. jbe design report prepared for the project <br />“Ty^TlI^afrtba. t X-^ovai efficiency of the Deer HUl Road Eaatn u <br />approximately 60 percent. <br />o-.o. nf 1 T If- netenrion BasiltsAVetlacd: <br />The project wUI not change ,o mfsi.r'The d^ai^trpOT'pre^^^ Ke project <br />”?:uy "d^-'^that me ^sphorous7emoval efficiency of Ute City of Long Lake Basina ts <br />approximately 20 percent. <br />I nny Lalt;y Alum Treatment: <br />The projea wUl no. change me quantity or tpality of surface w.»r mnoff. <br />SSa ■ nhour^her a nnrrienr Wger analysts ts needed). <br />Road Vo ts Wet Detention Bagin/Wetiaail; <br />The creek running ‘"r'“ <br />sjr^nrrasffi^w^'rwC-^ <br />The projea “^5“ removal efficiency of Uie combined!,rHl/C“rcr.yMliri: H ^ 50 percent. <br />ppf»r HiB Pnnd We^ Detention BasjnAVetland: <br />The creek tunning through me site drains Ate me w”Sbu^es join mey <br />drain southeast towards me proposed County Road Nm 6 W« Detention n <br />« 11 aae DNR proteaed wetland prior to ^^^0000. for me <br />construaion of a two-ceil wet detenuon basin nuroose of iiMroving water quality i <br />CSkf “-JS'dafg: re“o1; p«p'a?S^S L^“o^Sf in May es.ima.es mat m. phosphorus <br />removal efficiency of the basin is approximately 60 percent. <br />F\W»AES^Page 15 of 24 <br />5/24/95